Hi Wietse,
thanks for addressing this issue, a scaling solution for this problem will be
really appreciated.
We are an E-Mail Marketing provider and offer a hosted solution for a broad
customer base for which we want to be able separate the reputation (so
individual customers can take part in
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 14:00:28 Sthu Pous wrote:
Read the log (and post it if you need help).
I do not know why but now I get error:
502 5.5.1 Error: command not implemented
on server side I see:
lost connection after STARTTLS from unknown[1.2.3.4]
Honestly, you don't sound like you
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 13:02:08 Sthu Pous wrote:
[...]
454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem
And what is the local problem? Some permissions?
Read the log (and post it if you need help).
Rainer
On Saturday 09 May 2009 23:31:43 Just E. Mail wrote:
% make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
'CCARGS=-DHAS_PGSQL -I/usr/local/include/pgsql' \
'AUXLIBS=-L/usr/local/lib -lpq'
Since I have pg Server Client machines, I have no idea where is
'-I/usr/local/include/pgsql'
On Monday 11 May 2009 14:43:43 Just E. Mail wrote:
Rainer:
This my school project. I am setting up a new machine with just CentOS
5.3 installed and then I will first install PostgreSQL. Can you kindly
give me the name of the files I need to install and in what order.
Thank you, Rainer.
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:52:42 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
As I mentioned, we're using the XFS system for the queue, does that provide
any additional benefit, or would ext3 perform the same? Keep in mind, we
will be dealing with 1,000,000 piece mailouts during a session. My findings
were that
On Friday 20 March 2009 12:04:22 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
Is a simple ext3 partition usually the recommend file system?
Please do not top post.
We use ext3 to have simple, repeatable, clear server setups without surprises
or pitfalls. Performance is good enough for our needs, so I never actually
On Monday 20 October 2008 13:51:45 Wietse Venema wrote:
There are two loop detection mechanisms. You override one with []
around the next-hop domain. This mechanism is based on MX lookups.
You override the second one with myhostname, or a non-standard TCP
server port. This mechanism is
On Friday 10 October 2008 15:46:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
Will the FILTER action accept an empty nexthop?
It seems it does not (at least not correctly). If the nexthop is empty,
it seems to assume
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:15 Victor Duchovni wrote:
It is possible to cause the outgoing transport to depend solely on the
incoming IP in some special cases, but this is not something I am inclined
to recommend to anyone. So I would prefer to pretend it is generally not
possible,
10 matches
Mail list logo
