On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:50 AM Pierre Couderc wrote:
>
> postmap -q "yahoo.fr" pgsql:/etc/postfix/sql/transport_map.cf
> yahoo.fr,relay:[mx-eu.mail.am0.yahoodns.net]
In the SQL table substitute relay with smtp ...
Luca
s reason, the Postfix
smtp(8) client historically always closed the connection after
completing an attempt to deliver mail over TLS."
Is that true also in case of relayhost?
Also I cannot find in the doc how many email transactions are
performed during an SMTP over TLS connection.
Thanks
Luca Fornasari
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:56 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:44:36AM +0100, Luca Fornasari wrote:
>
> > The idea is to use a pipemap of LDAP queries; the first LDAP query
> > [...]
> > Since msExchMasterAccountSid is an OctetStream, I am wond
on
>
> apparently the client did not create Message-Id: header.
> it's up to the client to generate it.
You can use "always_add_missing_headers = yes" in main.cf in case you
need to reproduce older Postfix behaviour
Luca
D and pipe it as input key as
objectSid to a second LDAP query to retrieve the SamAccountName.
Since msExchMasterAccountSid is an OctetStream, I am wondering if this
will work ... does anyone already have experience on this?
Anyone did it with a custom script? What about performances?
Thanks
Luca
t the logs are saying >>
> for that case?
> >>
> Additionally i'd suggest you provide logs of both of the mentioned
> cases. Usually this helps much.
> >>
> >> You could try whats described under
> >> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_READ
.com
<http://mydomain1.com> *so for postfix it's not an error so we dont' reject
an email to the sender.
Not sure if it's clear.
Cheers
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:58 AM wilfried.es...@essignetz.de <
wilfried.es...@essignetz.de> wrote:
> Am 25.04.2018 um 19:44 schrieb Alfredo De Lu
Hi guys. any clue on this issue?
/Alfredo
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, 17:24 Alfredo De Luca, <alfredo.del...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all. I had a run with postmap and these are the founding
>
> so we have mydomain1.com which is the original domain.and
> mydomain2.com which is
Hi all. I had a run with postmap and these are the founding
so we have mydomain1.com which is the original domain.and mydomain2.com
which is the actual domanin of our company.
So when I do the following
- postmap -q arel...@mydomain1.comregexp:./domain_rewriting ldap:./
Hi all. Any clue/suggestions?
Cheers
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.del...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all. Here is my postfix config.of course with domains and ip
> changed.
>
> I had a look also on the ldap section and given what are the
> recco
${user} ${nexthop} ${sender} ${mailbox}
///
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.del...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks guys. I ll provide more info later.
> I checked on my configuration and we have the following for the
>
end an email to not existing user on
mydomain2.it I got an email back, instead if I send one to mydomain1.com
nothing.
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:44 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Alfredo De Luca wrote:
> > We have
Hi all.
We have 2 domain managed by postfix.
When I send an email to an not existing user in the first donain I got back
an email user unknown.while if I send it to the second domain I don't
receive anything.
Any issue/clue on this?
Thanks
--
*Alfredo*
Hi all.
We have Postfix 2.10 as company mailserver.
I noticed that when I send an email to a not-existing user mailbox in our
domain I don't receive an email back saying unknown mailbox or similar.
What do I need to do on main.cf in order to achieve that?
Cheers
--
*Alfredo*
and I have to wait to have
further fun with postfix but the smtp_host_lookup will surely solve the
problem.
Regards
Luca
On 20 October 2017 at 15:43, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> fusillator:
> > Does FILTER_README suppose you have a dns record for localhost?
>
nge and there is
a good opportunity the same boundary will be used in well formatted
MIME messages as well.
I do not like the idea to take personally the responsibility of
altering the content of emails ... also keep in mind digital
signatures.
All in all what I need here is a valid reason to justify the "new"
behavior of Postfix 2.6.6 compared to Postfix 2.3.3 ... and I
definitely found it.
Again thanks for you contribution.
Ciao
Luca
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Luca Fornasari:
>> In Postfix 2.3.3 the missing blank line was inserted while in Postfix
>> 2.6.6 it is not.
>> While looking at the source code diffs of src/global/mime_state.c I see
>&g
Wietse Venema:
> Luca Fornasari:
>> I have an old Postfix 2.3.3 installation where the built-in MIME
>> parser is modifying (adjust) wrongly formatted MIME messages while
>> relaying them.
>>
>> This is not happening on a newer Postfix 2.6.6 installation and
behavior (as
I did for the missing headers).
Unfortunately I'm dealing with a complex environment where correcting
bad coding behavior is not easy at all.
Can anyone confirm my findings and maybe elaborate further?
Thanks in advance for any information/comments.
Cheers
Luca
, Luca
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 14.02.2013 14:48, schrieb Luca Arzeni:
I'm in need of using a smarthost to relay all of my mail.
I'm unable to use an italia provider (aruba) as smarthos for my server.
I obtain the (in)famous 550 5.1.0
Hi,
I'm using Debian GNU Linux 6.0 squeeze,
postfix 2.7.1-1+squeeze1
I'm in need of using a smarthost to relay all of my mail.
I'm unable to use an italia provider (aruba) as smarthos for my server.
I obtain the (in)famous 550 5.1.0 X authentication failed
relevant part of logs:
Feb 6
On 20 Mar 2012, at 19:42, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2012-03-19 Luca Pacor wrote:
On 19 Mar 2012, at 20:04, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2012-03-19 Luca Pacor wrote:
If that.domain is in mydestination everything @ that.domain is
delivered locally
Please do not top-post your replies. It makes your old thread much
harder to follow. Thank you.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
Now postfix delivers everything @ that.domain to their mailer, also
for the user I manage locally:
Mar 4 12:24:07 server6 postfix
On 19 Mar 2012, at 20:04, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2012-03-19 Luca Pacor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +, Luca Pacor wrote:
Now postfix delivers everything @ that.domain to their mailer, also
for the user I manage locally:
Mar 4 12:24:07 server6
to postfix.
Any clue anybody?
Thanks
Luca
* * This e-mail and any
files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
e-Mail in error) please notify
I tried but nothing in that page seems to help me
Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
Am 20.01.2010 12:48, schrieb luca:
Hi,
Yes I know it is not a bug.
I would like to know if it is possible to configure postfix so that the
answers it gives to
the Exchange Server instruments it to avoid
Hi,
I have a working postfix server from long time.
Now i found out that mails with a read receipt coming from one (and only
one) Exchange Server
are correctely delivered as well as thier read receipt.
However when such mails are sent the sender receive this mail, too.
/This is an
Hi,
I have a working postfix server from long time.
Now i found out that mails with a read receipt coming from one (and only
one) Exchange Server
are correctely delivered as well as thier read receipt.
However when such mails are sent the sender receive this mail, too.
/This is an
Hi,
Yes I know it is not a bug.
I would like to know if it is possible to configure postfix so that the
answers it gives to
the Exchange Server instruments it to avoid producing the email to the
sending user.
Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
Am 20.01.2010 11:55, schrieb luca:
Hi,
I have
I saw the description of the variable nonetheless I was asking if is it only
useful in case of a backup mail exchange.
Thanks for your support.
Regards
Luca Cazzaniga
--
** ATTENZIONE !!! **
Il presente messaggio ed i suoi allegati devono intendersi ad uso esclusivo
realize that a sender address without domain is rewrited appending the
@mydomain instead @myorigin
erasing the dash in the variable $mydomain the rewrite appends @myorigin as
hoped.
mydomain = topolinea.it
behaviour with dash (mydomain = topo-linea.it)
luca gets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
behaviour
31 matches
Mail list logo