On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 10:28:14AM -0500, Greg Sims via Postfix-users wrote:
> We receive over 500 log entries per day from Comcast that look like this:
>
> Sep 18 03:05:07 mail0 r105/smtp[15929]: AE3378857BA: to=,
> relay=mx1.comcast.net[96.114.157.80]:25, delay=0.69,
> delays=
would
reduce over time -- but this has not been the case.
This deferred / retry seems to take a good deal of resources from both
Comcast and the sender of email. Is there anything we can do to reduce the
impact?
Thanks, Greg
___
Postfix-users mailing
Wietse and are testing now.
Thank you for your time!
:-)
Danjel
PS: Sorry to Wietse for replying directly to you, my K-9 is doing that I
cannot find out how to change it and often forget to manually correct it.
On 21-09-2024 21:59, Gerald Galster via Postfix-users wrote:
My server is still
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 05:54:38AM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
> Here are the output of my postconf -nf (it's quite simple). can you
> give suggestions for better options? Thanks in advance.
This is not a very productive way to get help, you really should be
askin
" so that rDNS will be
> compliant.
> I have searched online, but am still confused about what to change.
You could publish a spf record for mail.jungersen.dk
and dkim sign emails sent by @mail.jungersen.dk.
Unless explicitly configured, dmarc is valid for a domain
including subdomains whereas s
Danjel Jungersen:
>
>
> On 21 September 2024 14:13:49 CEST, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> >Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> >> I see 3 things that worry me about this record:
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> >>
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> I see 3 things that worry me about this record:
> *
>
>
>212.27.12.12
>2
>
> none
> fail
> fail
>
>
>
> some-real-receiver.tld
&g
www.jungersen.dk>
Holsbjergvej 39
2620 Albertslund
Tel: 43 64 10 00
Mobil: 20 42 20 11___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 21/09/24 17:16, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
# postconf -d message_size_limit
message_size_limit = 1024
as you see above, message_size_limit defauts to 10MB?
that would be too limited in my case.
It is very limiting, and to be honest I have increased it on my postfix
as well, but
On 21/09/24 11:26, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
dear list,
I see both postfix and dovecot can set the limit for mailbox size and
message size.
So which to set it as the better way? or both?
It depends on the delivery agent:
* For the postfix local(8) lda you would use mailbox_size_limit
if the
size limit is globally applied. Whereas with dovecot you can use the quota
plugin that allows for per user control, allowing different users to have
different sizes.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send
suggest to stop that discussion.
Best regards,
Gerald
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Am Fr, Sep 20, 2024 at 20:37:10 +0200 schrieb Gerald Galster via Postfix-users:
That is probably because your mailserver's ip reputation
has not been reset by t-online. Have you ever contacted
What do you mean with reset? T-Online refused to accept mails from
servers using our own IP r
imprint to your email, otherwise they will
deny your request.
Best regards,
Gerald
_______________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> hawky--- via Postfix-users:
> > Hi Wietse,
> >
> > we are struggling with t-online.de: As you may know as SMTP client you
> > have to fulfill a bunch of requirements to be able to send mails to
> > t-online.de. From tim
hawky--- via Postfix-users:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> we are struggling with t-online.de: As you may know as SMTP client you
> have to fulfill a bunch of requirements to be able to send mails to
> t-online.de. From time to time we receive mails from t-online.de, but
> can't answ
hawky--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-09-20 17:35:
Hi Wietse,
we are struggling with t-online.de: As you may know as SMTP client you
have to fulfill a bunch of requirements to be able to send mails to
t-online.de. From time to time we receive mails from t-online.de, but
can't a
ust fulfill the requirements..." ;-)
Thanks.
--
Hawky
Am 20.09.2024 16:25 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
hawky--- via Postfix-users:
Hi!
I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but
return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client.
By looking
On 2024-09-20 at 09:30:56 UTC-0400 (Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:30:56 +)
hawky--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi!
I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but
return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client.
By looking at the SMTP status
hawky--- via Postfix-users:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but
> return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client.
>
> By looking at the SMTP status codes
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMTP_server_retur
aybe it is possible in a non-obvious
way?
Is it possible?
And if yes, can someone give me a hint howto implement?
Thank you.
--
Hawky
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:53:10AM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Let's let the code bake in, and if nothing further needs to change, I'll
> drop Wietse a fresh pointer to the git branch.
I looked more closely at the available OpenSSL APIs, and found a way f
[ Thread unhijacked ]
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:16:59PM -0400, John Levine via Postfix-users wrote:
> We have a bunch of role addresses that we forward to the people in the role.
aliases:
owner-localuser: postmaster
localuser: mbox@provider.example
> If the message
ple.com bar
Is there some clever way I can tell it to rewrite all of the
envelope senders for stuff forwarded through one set of alises?
R's,
John
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 00:40:35 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > So you should be able to apply the top-most commit at:
> >
> > https://github.co
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 00:40:35 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> So you should be able to apply the top-most commit at:
>
> https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/commits/provider-kex/
>
> to a Postfix 3.10-20240917 (or earlier, modulo the expected conflict i
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 21:41:44 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > Can you build Postfix after running "makedefs" with "OPT='-g -ggdb3'",
> >
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 21:41:44 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Can you build Postfix after running "makedefs" with "OPT='-g -ggdb3'",
> and set a break-point in posttls-finger at line ~1054 of tls_misc.c:
>
> 1054 if (tls_get
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
> > > TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
> > > (128/128 bits) key-excha
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:36:23PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> It works, and it's even interoperable with gmail's MX. But provider
> key exchanges aren't logged for outbound connections by smtp(8) or
> posttls-finger:
That's unexpected, it is
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 17:44:36 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Try the below:
Perfect:
> Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
> TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
> (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519_kyber768 server-signature ECDSA
> (prime
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 19:10:05 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
> > > TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA2
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 09:18:23PM +1200, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 19/09/24 21:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Anonymous TLS connection
On 19/09/24 21:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
(128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519_kyber768 server-signature
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 05:44:36PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > (FWIW, nginx logs unknown groups by their group id, in this case "0x6399")
> >
> > https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/master/src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c#L5138
>
> No
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
> > TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
> > (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519_kyber768 server-signature ECDSA
> > (prime256v1)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 09:02:39AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Could the reverse lookup be fixed as well, for Received headers and logging?
>
> > Anonymous TLS connection established from X: TLSv1.3 with cipher
> > TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
> > (12
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 08:26:53 +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users wrote:
> I confirm your patch works, I can now use these new key exchanges in Postfix.
Could the reverse lookup be fixed as well, for Received headers and logging?
> Anonymous TLS connection established from X: T
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:54:41 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Not a problem, the proposed decoration would be part of the element, but
> I'm arguing that it is not needed.
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/21633#issuecomment-2359871975
I agree
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:54:41PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > Would it be an option to pass the list through SSL_CTX_set1_curves_list()
> > first, and only if that fails, fall back to checking the individual
> > elements?
>
> Not necessary.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 07:58:31PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:02:50 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > This makes it possible to write "forward-looking" configs that will use
> > newer groups o
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:02:50 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> This makes it possible to write "forward-looking" configs that will use
> newer groups once they're available in the OpenSSL runtime.
Well actually, in this case it achieves the opposi
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 05:38:25PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Oh, I see now. If SSL_CTX_set1_curves_list() is defined, nginx runs
> it directly on the whole list (without checking the elements first).
> OBJ_sn2id is only used for older openssl.
The problem is
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:01:42 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> The OBJ_sn2nid() function is not extensible, and not affected by loading
> of providers. To actually be able to map this algorithm to a "nid", the
> base OpenSSL code would have to know abo
d has not changed much with
OpenSSL 3.0, beyond some bitrot fixes. Support for provider-based
signature schemes was not one of the changes.
The code would have to be changed to bypass "nids" (which are for
built-in algorithms only), and use the group name (be it slightly less
efficient)
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 14:02:32 +0200, Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 21:29:07 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > You should initially test with "posttls-finger",
>
> `posttls-finger -L ssl-debug` shows su
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 21:29:07 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 01:04:58PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>
> > Specifically, this provider implements new Key Encapsulation Methods like
> > "x25519_kyber768", which I can use wi
e OpenSSL library
that has support for these new groups?
> but so does nginx, which does accept that name.
Must be linked with a different OpenSSL then.
--
Viktor.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
lse that
is holding Postfix from using algorithms from an external openssl provider?
Geert
[1] https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider/
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Yea, I got that. I made changes as I stick my maps under a sub directory.
I would love to see a redacted copy of your configs.
Postfix configs are defiantly page turners.
--john
On 9/17/2024 9:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 08:01:51AM -0400, John Hill
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 08:01:51AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> main.cf:
> indexed = ${default_database_type}:${config_directory}/
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ${indexed}recipient-access
And of course it really should be:
smtpd_recipient_res
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 08:01:51AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> main.cf:
> indexed = ${default_database_type}:${config_directory}/
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ${indexed}recipient-access
>
> I see what your doing here.
> It is less to type.
&g
main.cf:
indexed = ${default_database_type}:${config_directory}/
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ${indexed}recipient-access
I see what your doing here.
It is less to type.
Is there any other advantage?
--john
___
Postfix-users mailing list
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 07:20:18PM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
> > - Just inbound mail from external sources? Or also other mail (locally
> >submitted or generated)?
>
> yes I just reject message to that us
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
- Just inbound mail from external sources? Or also other mail (locally
submitted or generated)?
yes I just reject message to that user from external source via smtp,
does that setting work?
- What is the address class of "domain.com"
${WANTS}
>
> %.${DBEXT}: %
> # Leading TAB
> postmap $@
Oops, "postmap $<", not "postmap $@". Note that pattern rules are a
GNUmake feature, and are not, for example, supported in NetBSD make.
--
Viktor.
_____
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:38:15AM +0800, Wesley via Postfix-users wrote:
> I want to deny all messages for a local user.
> if I setup policy like this:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient-access
>
> in recipient-access:
>
> u...@domain.co
s.dev/
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 11.09.24 15:49, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
My own user have domain example.com and send email from us...@example.com
example.com have signed e-mail DKIM and SPF and _dmarc.example.com
with politic "p-reject"
my server (my MX) check via milter opendkim and opendmarc like:
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:55:22AM -0500, Dan Lists via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > > How many distinct sender domains are in scope? If it is just a small
> > > handful, you can restriction classes:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:55:22AM -0500, Dan Lists via Postfix-users wrote:
> > How many distinct sender domains are in scope? If it is just a small
> > handful, you can restriction classes:
> >
> > main.cf:
> > smtpd_restriction_classes =
> >
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:29:21AM -0500, Dan Lists via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to
> send
&
Mark Huizer via Postfix-users:
> If I then send mail going through the relay, and check the maillog for
> canonical lines and the envelope lines:
>
> Sep 16 08:15:58 s-mailrelay2 postfix/smtpd[95962]: <
> shell1.local.dohd.org[10.0.0.170]: MAIL FROM:
> SIZE=528
> Sep
. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:29:21AM -0500, Dan Lists via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to send
> email. Some of those devices do not do authentication. I'd like to
> restrict the sender domain based on the IP.
How
Marcus Park via Postfix-users:
>
>
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > Marcus Park via Postfix-users:
> >> Hello postifx,
> >>
> >> I am getting trouble in the unwanted email delivery.
> >>
> >> Say my hostname is "foo.com&quo
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Marcus Park via Postfix-users:
Hello postifx,
I am getting trouble in the unwanted email delivery.
Say my hostname is "foo.com" (what 'hostname' command shows).
And I do have the same domain name "foo.com" setup in
/etc/postf
Marcus Park via Postfix-users:
> Hello postifx,
>
> I am getting trouble in the unwanted email delivery.
>
> Say my hostname is "foo.com" (what 'hostname' command shows).
> And I do have the same domain name "foo.com" setup in
> /etc/postfix/vi
ter I open webmail with that username logging in, message can
be read by webmail.
Where have I setup wrong to postfix by this case?
Thanks.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:50 AM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Dan Lists via Postfix-users:
> > I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to
> send
> > email. Some of those devices do not do authe
Dan Lists via Postfix-users:
> I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to send
> email. Some of those devices do not do authentication. I'd like to
> restrict the sender domain based on the IP.
>
> I'm looking for something like smtpd_s
I've been re-reading the documents, but I don't see how to do this.
Does anyone know how to do this?
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
p 13, 2024 at 2:22 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We are running a pretty big postfix installation for a big corporate
> > customer.
> >
> > Next week, there are migrations in the backend for some mailbox
Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users:
> Hi!
>
> We are running a pretty big postfix installation for a big corporate customer.
>
> Next week, there are migrations in the backend for some mailboxes, and
> the inbound mail for these mailboxes should be put on hold on the
> postf
Thanks (as always) for your help!
Jens
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
quot;relay" domains.
--
Viktor.
_______________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
by sender domains. So I was asking the info
here.
Can you give further help?
Thanks.
September 13, 2024 at 9:04 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:11:43AM +, Marcus Park via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> >
> >
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:11:43AM +, Marcus Park via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have two domains in my system, say they are a.com and b.com
> I want the sender (sasl user) in a.com to use postfix-a as outgoing mta.
> and b.com uses postfix-b as outgoing server.
>
> How can I
.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
he flag options
but missed eol just above them...
> Sorry, no on-line video for doing this.
>
> Wietse
Thank you Wietse - very much appreciated.
Felix
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Rejaine Da Silveira Monteiro via Postfix-users:
> There is anyway to resend saved eml files using postfix?
The preferred way to resend such mail is to create a new message,
and to attach the eml file as attachment type message/rfc822.
The Postfix interface for sending messages from file is /
informações nela contidas ou tomar qualquer ação baseada nessas
informações. Se você recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise
imediatamente ao remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o.
Agradecemos sua cooperação.*
___
Postfix-users mailing
Felix Ingram via Postfix-users:
> Hello all,
>
> I've written a program to be the final destination for mail using
> pipe.8. I'm reading the message in from stdin, and it appears that
> lines end with \n rather than \r\n, which is then causing parsing
> issues in anot
.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Felix
P.S. Apologies if this ends up as a duplicate post - I forgot to subscribe
before sending the first message.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le
q.html#what-are-local-and-override-config-files
https://rspamd.com/doc/faq.html#what-are-the-locald-and-overrided-directories
The rspamd mailinglist is better suited for this:
https://lists.rspamd.com/mailman/listinfo/users
Best regards,
Gerald
___________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
hank you for your patience and your help!
Best regards
Danjel
On 09-09-2024 13:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
Hey!
I have set up clamav, and I think it works
But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then
clamav. Thats a
Hi
I would be happy to privately send sample emails with someone between
domains that have a DMARC reject policy.
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:49, natan via Postfix-users pisze:
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 15:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
The problem is with DKIM signing when I try to reply to a message
and the external recipient has DMARC verification
If I have a p=none policy in DMARC it
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
The problem is with DKIM signing when I try to reply to a message
and the external recipient has DMARC verification
If I have a p=none policy in DMARC it works correctly but if
p=reject it is known - the message is rejected due to
W dniu 11.09.2024 o 11:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Bill I have seperate setup like
1)one serve for outgoing
2)one server for incomming + dovecot cluster
I personally still don't knbow how your system works.
W
On 11.09.24 09:11, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
Bill I have seperate setup like
1)one serve for outgoing
2)one server for incomming + dovecot cluster
I personally still don't knbow how your system works.
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:07, Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze:
On 2024-09-10
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:43:25 +0200
> Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sep 10 10:45:21 genio postfix/smtpd[2066845]: 7C1CB83872A:
> client=mobiledyn-62-240-135-13.mrsn.it[62.240.135.13],
> sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=more...@cerm.unifi.it
> Sep 10 10:45:22 gen
Hi
Thenx for replay
Bill I have seperate setup like
1)one serve for outgoing
2)one server for incomming + dovecot cluster
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:07, Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze:
On 2024-09-10 at 08:05:21 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:05:21 +0200)
natan via Postfix-users
is rumored to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:17:11 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2024-09-10 at 04:51:13 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:51:13 +0200)
> Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:43:25 +0200
> > Enrico Morelli
> On 2024-09-10 19:10 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> Den 09.09.2024 kl. 15.14 skrev Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
>> Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
>>> On 09-09-2024 13:46, chandan via Postfix-users wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=
> -o local_recipient_maps=
> -o relay_recipient_maps=
> -o smtpd_restriction_classes=
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=
> -o sm
Den 09.09.2024 kl. 15.14 skrev Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
On 09-09-2024 13:46, chandan via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Hey!
I have set up clamav, and I think it works
But when a mail is
Den 10.09.2024 07:10, skrev Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
Thank you SO much for taking the time. Appreciated!
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
wrote:
I got the attached report about a double bounce from my incoming postfix
server "Postfix
On 2024-09-10 at 04:51:13 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:51:13 +0200)
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:43:25 +0200
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users wrote:
Dear all,
I'd installed rspamd as antispam in my postfix mail server.
Everything
On 2024-09-10 at 08:05:21 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:05:21 +0200)
natan via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi
Is avilable to run thats setup use postfix+milter ?
For test I run thats setup:
1)enable addheaders on dovecot
2)create special rules in sieve like:
if allof (header
1 - 100 of 5472 matches
Mail list logo
