On 24 Oct 2016, at 16:54, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
So you block all of AS14061 because there supposedly is a spammer in
the block?
The relevant TXT record in that DNSBL asserts 276 "abusers" on AS14061
in the past week. Eyeballing the visible routes for AS14061, that seems
to be
li...@lazygranch.com [2016-10-24 14:52 -0700] :
> Oh, I didn't me YOU as in you personally. Sorry about that.
> Maybe it is an American was of speaking.
No offenSe taken. ;-)
> The reply from Digital Ocean is just to change my IP. I'm
> shocked they don't want to defend their IP space. I
. (Not trivial).
Original Message
From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:33 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Reply To: st...@niklaas.eu
Subject: Re: (Semi OT) RBL shakedown
li...@lazygranch.com [2016-10-24 13:54 -0700] :
> So you block all of AS14061 beca
li...@lazygranch.com [2016-10-24 13:54 -0700] :
> So you block all of AS14061 because there supposedly is
> a spammer in the block? I grumblingly agreed when Wietse said
> it was proper to block a specific IP when only one user was
> spamming, but this seems excessive.
No, I personally don't.
Gersdorff
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 1:41 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Reply To: st...@niklaas.eu
Subject: Re: (Semi OT) RBL shakedown
li...@lazygranch.com [2016-10-24 13:20 -0700] :
> If you use the uceprotect RBL, note that they are involved in a
> shakedown to solicit money to be remove
li...@lazygranch.com [2016-10-24 13:20 -0700] :
> If you use the uceprotect RBL, note that they are involved in a
> shakedown to solicit money to be removed from their list. Much like
> spamrl, I'd suggest not using them since they have an obvious false
> positive problem.
>
>
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] För li...@lazygranch.com
Skickat: den 24 oktober 2016 22:20
Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: (Semi OT) RBL shakedown
If you use the uceprotect RBL, note that they are involved in a shakedown to
solicit money to be removed from their list. Much like spamrl
If you use the uceprotect RBL, note that they are involved in a
shakedown to solicit money to be removed from their list. Much like
spamrl, I'd suggest not using them since they have an obvious false
positive problem.
http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?ipr=107.170.248.198
Their own system
