On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:27:39PM -0400, Adam C. Mathews wrote:
Presenting using the following blacklists...
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
psbl.surriel.com
zen.spamhaus.org
These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opinions on a
couple additional ones. Specifically look for
Rob McEwen wrote:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
That's Rob's list, haha! It's cool to hear folks are using it. He's
been plugging it on spam-l for a while.
Stan, I really do like you... and I don't want to make an enemy out of
you... but there are massive mis-characterizations in that statement
* Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Exactly.
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#Postfix_Examples
this example lacks the usage described further down in Name Based DNS
Lookup
reject_rbl_sender hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2
I fixed that now in the
* Stan Hoeppner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I highly recommend you sub to spam-l and post your question there also.
http://www.claws-and-paws.com/spam-l/spam-l.html
FWIW, here's my dnsbl config:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
Thanks for the pruning tips Ralf. I figured some of those were dead,
just hadn't bothered to do any verification recently.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Stan Hoeppner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I highly recommend you sub to spam-l and post your question there also.
* Stan Hoeppner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for the pruning tips Ralf. I figured some of those were dead,
just hadn't bothered to do any verification recently.
There COULD be something in the logs. It can be dangerous to leave
those old entries in, since the DNS servers could return 127.0.0.1
