Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-15 10:42:
That's what Dino is trying to do. Make amavis-over-milter add an DKIM
AR-header, then make OpenDMARC evaluate DMARC using that header. It
may be true that SpamAssassin 4 has a DMARC test, but Amavis >does not
use such test hit for a
So as per your previous post, setting a policy such as this one would
do the trick?
...
This would be necessary to keep DMARC AR headers after they passed the
content_filter Amavis. It is not necessary for OpenDMARC to do its work.
It was not clear what "skipping OpenDMARC" means exactly,
>Conceptually you can. I tested it yesterday and it worked. At first I
>encountered said phenomenon that the >mails in my inbox had no DMARC AR
>header, but that was because the content_filter Amavis removed them. >After
>disabling DKIM verification on the content_filter, headers looked like
This question has stirred up a lot of answers but if I’m understanding
correctly, it looks like I cannot use opendmarc with amavisd in
postfix as a pre-queue filter for dkim. The only viable option is
opendkim with opendmarc as pre-queue milters like I was originally doing.
Conceptually you
>That's what Dino is trying to do. Make amavis-over-milter add an DKIM
>AR-header, then make OpenDMARC evaluate DMARC using that header. It may be
>true that SpamAssassin 4 has a DMARC test, but Amavis >does not use such test
>hit for a policy enforcement.
>Amavis has support for rspamd as a
currect, but amavisd support rspamd with have dmarc
what?
Amavis has support for rspamd as a spam_scanner, i.e. for scoring, not
for DMARC policy enforcement.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
On 14.11.23 18:13, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
This is a confusing statement.
in what way ?
amavisd-milter was already part of Dino's smtpd_milters. It is like you would
have said:
> http://www.postfix.org/. Just use that, it replaces the /etc you
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 19:44:
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
On 14.11.23 18:13, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace
Damian via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 19:28:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
This is a confusing statement.
in what way ?, if you can configure opendmarc with postfix why is
amavisd milter a problem ?
amavisd only miss
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
On 14.11.23 18:13, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
it's the same as
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
This is a confusing statement.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To
this does not make sense unless you use it somewhere.
Can you elaborate?
yes, the configuration variable you showed is not used by anything, unless
you refer to it elsewhere in postfix configuration.
what do logs say?
On 14.11.23 11:16, Dino Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
Logs don't
it happens to me sometimes, I make changes to the postfix configuration and I
forget to restart postfix for it to take effect (systemctl restart postfix
opendkim opendmarc etc).
Could it be that simple?
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 11:16:18 -0500 Dino Edwards via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Logs
By “getting skipped” I mean I have no logs of opendmarc doing anything.
Do you have logs of opendmarc doing anything if you remove Amavis from
smtpd_milters?
I don’t understand how I would disable dkim in my content_filter
policy. Dkim verification is either enabled or disabled in Amavis
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:04 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [pfx] Re: Postfix, Amavis DKIM and DMARC
>this does not make sense unless you use it somewhere.
Can you elaborate?
>what do lo
: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 9:13 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [pfx] Re: Postfix, Amavis DKIM and DMARC
I tried this config but sadly it doesn’t work, OpenDMARC (127.0.0.1:54321) gets
skipped completely
If "getting skipped" means that you don't see Authentication-Results
I tried this config but sadly it doesn’t work, OpenDMARC
(127.0.0.1:54321) gets skipped completely
If "getting skipped" means that you don't see Authentication-Results for
DMARC, I have a feeling that you didn't disable DKIM verification on
your content_filter Interface Policy. Amavis will
On 14.11.23 07:43, Dino Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
I have been using OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC as smtpd_milters in Postfix and
Amavis as a content filter. I'm trying to replace OpenDKIM with Amavis for
DKIM verify and signing. The problem is that since Amavis is setup as an
after-queue
20 matches
Mail list logo
