[pfx] Re: Reply To header

2023-04-29 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 00:06, Roger Klorese via Postfix-users > wrote: > > Reply-To, not Reply To. > What a bone-head mistake. Thanks. Now it works just fine. -- Doug ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe

[pfx] Re: Reply To header

2023-04-29 Thread Roger Klorese via Postfix-users
Reply-To, not Reply To. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 28, 2023, at 11:51 PM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users > wrote: > >  >>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 23:13, Noel Jones via Postfix-users >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users >>> wrote: >>>

[pfx] Re: Reply To header

2023-04-29 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 23:13, Noel Jones via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users >> wrote: >> >> I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first >> line it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line.

[pfx] Re: Reply To header

2023-04-29 Thread Noel Jones via Postfix-users
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users > wrote: > > I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first > line it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line. However, that > causes postfix to terminate the headers and puts the Reply To