Scott Kitterman wrote in
<4d53bd64-1672-49c5-adca-487f320f8...@kitterman.com>:
..
|>But i treat your answer as if milters will not do that.
|
|If you want to talk about DKIM replay, the IETF DKIM working group \
|was just rechartered to work on that exact thing: ietf-d...@ietf.org .
Maybe a
On March 11, 2023 6:05:52 PM UTC, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
wrote:
>postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
> :
> |On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\
> |sers wrote:
> |
> |> - sign the entire message as for now,
> |
> |You're confusing the message
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
:
|On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\
|sers wrote:
|
|> - sign the entire message as for now,
|
|You're confusing the message and the envelope.
..no? No.
|> - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
wrote:
> - sign the entire message as for now,
You're confusing the message and the envelope.
> - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all receivers
> are actually covered by the DKIM signature, so
The