[pfx] Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?

2023-03-11 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Scott Kitterman wrote in <4d53bd64-1672-49c5-adca-487f320f8...@kitterman.com>: .. |>But i treat your answer as if milters will not do that. | |If you want to talk about DKIM replay, the IETF DKIM working group \ |was just rechartered to work on that exact thing: ietf-d...@ietf.org . Maybe a

[pfx] Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?

2023-03-11 Thread Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users
On March 11, 2023 6:05:52 PM UTC, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote: >postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in > : > |On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\ > |sers wrote: > | > |> - sign the entire message as for now, > | > |You're confusing the message

[pfx] Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?

2023-03-11 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in : |On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-u\ |sers wrote: | |> - sign the entire message as for now, | |You're confusing the message and the envelope. ..no? No. |> - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all

[pfx] Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?

2023-03-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 01:54:01AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote: > - sign the entire message as for now, You're confusing the message and the envelope. > - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all receivers > are actually covered by the DKIM signature, so The