On 5/10/23 02:40, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 8/05/23 00:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
After multiple such connnections, postscreen could theoretically
decide that the client is unlikely to ever connect to the primary
MX, but by then the client will likely already have given
On 8/05/23 00:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
After multiple such connnections, postscreen could theoretically
decide that the client is unlikely to ever connect to the primary
MX, but by then the client will likely already have given up, and
postscreen has done no harm.
Postscreen
Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 13:59, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
> postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Look at output from:
> > > >
> > > > (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
> > > >
> > >
> > > this gives an empty set...
> >
> > In that case I
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 14:28, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users:
> > On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:12, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
> > > postfix-users@postfix.org>
Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:12, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
> > postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Look at output from:
> >>
> >> (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
> >>
> >
> >
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 13:59, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> > > Look at output from:
> > >
> > > (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
> > >
> >
> > this gives an empty set...
>
> In that case I need the COMPLETE postscreen logging for
> such
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
Look at output from:
(postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:12, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
this gives an empty set...
On 07.05.23 12:44, Mihaly Zachar via
Mihaly Zachar:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
> postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Look at output from:
> >
> > (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
> >
>
> this gives an empty set...
In that case I need the COMPLETE postscreen logging for
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:12, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
> postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Look at output from:
>>
>> (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
>>
>
> this gives an empty set...
>
>
I think I have figured it
On Sun, 7 May 2023 at 03:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> Look at output from:
>
> (postconf -n; postconf -P) | grep soft_bounce
>
this gives an empty set...
___
Postfix-users mailing list --
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here is my postscreen section of my config:
> >
> > # POSTSCREEN
> > postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
> > cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
> > postscreen_denylist_action = enforce
> >
Mihaly Zachar via Postfix-users:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is my postscreen section of my config:
>
> # POSTSCREEN
> postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
> cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
> postscreen_denylist_action = enforce
> postscreen_greet_wait = 10s
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
