[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-07 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> On Dec 7, 2023, at 00:27, patpro--- via Postfix-users > wrote: > > December 7, 2023 9:12 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users" > wrote: > >> Indeed: postsrsd upgraded: 1.10 -> 2.0.8_1,1 > > OK. I’m still running 1.10 : it does not use a config file. Configuration is > only in /etc/rc.conf.

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-07 Thread patpro--- via Postfix-users
December 7, 2023 9:12 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users" wrote: > Indeed: postsrsd upgraded: 1.10 -> 2.0.8_1,1 OK. I’m still running 1.10 : it does not use a config file. Configuration is only in /etc/rc.conf. It’s normal that config files for 2.0.8 are new and not tunned. regards, patpro

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-07 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 23:48, patpro--- via Postfix-users > wrote: > > December 6, 2023 10:00 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users" > wrote: > >> I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and ran >> fine. However postsrsd is >> causing me a few issues. I get the

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-06 Thread patpro--- via Postfix-users
Hello, December 6, 2023 10:00 AM, "Doug Hardie via Postfix-users" wrote: > I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and ran > fine. However postsrsd is > causing me a few issues. I get the impression that postsrsd got updated, but > I can't tell for sure. FreeBSD

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-06 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
No backups for that file that I can find. Although there probably are on one of the other systems. Have to check. There is over 400 GB of space available on the disk. Now for the interesting part. At 1 am this morning, postsrsd was not working so i removed it from main.cf. At noon today, I

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-06 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2023-12-06 at 04:00:21 UTC-0500 (Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:00:21 -0800) Doug Hardie via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: I just upgraded FreeBSD from 13.2 to 14.0. Postfix just picked up and ran fine. However postsrsd is causing me a few issues. I get the impression that postsrsd got

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-06 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
Not that I can find > On Dec 6, 2023, at 02:49, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users > wrote: > > Dnia 6.12.2023 o godz. 01:00:21 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users pisze: >> The config files (conf and conf.sample) all had dates >> of 14 Nov so I suspect they were replaced. I don't know what the

[pfx] Re: postsrsd

2023-12-06 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 6.12.2023 o godz. 01:00:21 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users pisze: > The config files (conf and conf.sample) all had dates > of 14 Nov so I suspect they were replaced. I don't know what the original > files contained anymore. Does the upgrade save the previous config files anywhere as

[pfx] Re: Postsrsd question

2023-05-16 Thread raf via Postfix-users
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 08:40:50PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: > Hello list, > > for Postsrsd, it rewrite all the sender addresses even if messages should > be delivered locally. > > how to setup it to not rewrite sender for local addresses? > > Thanks If you only forward

[pfx] Re: Postsrsd question

2023-05-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 15.05.23 20:40, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: for Postsrsd, it rewrite all the sender addresses even if messages should be delivered locally. how to setup it to not rewrite sender for local addresses? I use multiple postfix instance and one instance for outgoing mail where postsrs is