On Sun, September 10, 2023 2:03 am, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Your amavis content filter has a non-trivial backlog of mail, probably
because each message takes a long time to process. Here the message sat
5.4 seconds in the incoming queue and then took 11 seconds to to deliver
to
On Sun, September 10, 2023 2:03 am, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hard to say, you're not well prepared to isolate the issue, and
> the symptoms are diverse.
Viktor, Matus, many thanks!!
Viktor, I think and I'm afraid you've hit the nail on the head... that's
certainly large if not
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 08:10:19PM +1000, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> hmmm, noticed that system has quite high load average, reaching 1.5/1.6
> when I was checking... is that my problem ? or part of it ?
> have I overloaded/underresourced ?
>
> Tasks: 114, 98 thr; 2 running 2
> Load ave
On Sat, September 9, 2023 9:00 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
>> On Sat, September 9, 2023 2:42 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
>> Postfix-users wrote:
Matus, Michel, thanks
> did you reorder those lines? look at timestamps.
didn't intend to, but maybe stuffed up when I've tr
On Sat, September 9, 2023 2:42 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
On 08.09.23 23:13, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
logs from unsuccessful attempts are important, not from the one that
succeeded.
On 09.09.23 20:03, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
is there some proper w
On 2023-09-09, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> hmmm, noticed that system has quite high load average, reaching 1.5/1.6
> when I was checking... is that my problem ? or part of it ?
> have I overloaded/underresourced ?
>
> Tasks: 114, 98 thr; 2 running 2
> Load average: 1.18 0.92 0.69
How mu
On Sat, September 9, 2023 3:52 am, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 11:13:02PM +1000, lists--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Your amavis content filter has a non-trivial backlog of mail, probably
> because each message takes a long time to process. Here the mes
On Sat, September 9, 2023 2:42 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> On 08.09.23 23:13, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Matus, Viktor, thanks
> logs from unsuccessful attempts are important, not from the one that
> succeeded.
is there some proper way to identify that..? lookin
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 11:13:02PM +1000, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> # grep "C92564346E5" /var/log/maillog
> Sep 8 16:41:31 geko postfix/cleanup[15407]: C92564346E5:
> message-id=
> Sep 8 16:41:31 geko postfix/qmgr[1654]: C92564346E5: from=,
> size=3262, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Sep
On 08.09.23 23:13, lists--- via Postfix-users wrote:
a user reported mail client message:
"It hard to sent mail we try 2-3 times then sent."
screengrab from mail client had: sending failed, couldn't send, connection
to outgoing server timed out
logs from unsuccessful attempts are important, no
10 matches
Mail list logo
