Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

2020-11-15 Thread Richard Siddall
Phil Stracchino wrote: On 11/13/20 1:22 PM, John Fawcett wrote: On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized). - Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

2020-11-15 Thread John Fawcett
On 15/11/2020 09:52, Nick Tait wrote: > On 14/11/20 7:30 am, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> I think what the OP is asking here is, can Yahoo/Oath be compelled to >> provide a more useful failure message relaying the informative response >> provided by OP's Postfix instance. >> >> And the answer to

Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

2020-11-15 Thread Nick Tait
On 14/11/20 7:30 am, Phil Stracchino wrote: I think what the OP is asking here is, can Yahoo/Oath be compelled to provide a more useful failure message relaying the informative response provided by OP's Postfix instance. And the answer to that, unfortunately, is no. But by the look of things

Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

2020-11-13 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 11/13/20 1:22 PM, John Fawcett wrote: > On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: >> My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized). >> - >> Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT >> from

Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

2020-11-13 Thread John Fawcett
On 13/11/2020 07:38, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > My server bounced a message. Here is the server log (sanitized). > - > Nov 13 02:07:52 myserver postfix/smtpd[27706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from sonic302-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com[98.137.68.149]: 554 5.7.1 >