On 1/10/2013 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
On 1/10/2013 3:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
reject_unverified_recipient,
That works.
check_sender_access cdb:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing-
Daniel L. Miller:
> On 1/10/2013 3:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Daniel L. Miller:
> >>check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
> >>reject_unverified_recipient,
> > That works.
> >
> >> check_sender_access cdb:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing-list-targets,
> >> rejec
On 1/10/2013 3:38 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
reject_unverified_recipient,
That works.
check_sender_access cdb:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing-list-targets,
reje
On 1/10/2013 3:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
reject_unverified_recipient,
That works.
check_sender_access cdb:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing-list-targets,
reject_unverified_recipient
You changed more than
Daniel L. Miller:
> check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
> reject_unverified_recipient,
That works.
> check_sender_access cdb:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing-list-targets,
> reject_unverified_recipient
You changed more than hash->cdb.
Wietse
On 1/9/2013 5:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
check_recipient_access = hash:/etc/postfix/maps/mailing_lists
reject_unverified_recipient,
...
That will do it.
Glad to know I'm on the right track. I'm still doing something wrong.
Naturally I tried to get fancy - I'm using cdb (whi
On 1/9/2013 4:57 PM, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
I think there is some misunderstanding here.
On 2013-01-10 01:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
How about: don't address-verify a mailing list that you are
subscribed to. Doing so is pointless. Worse, it may cause
Daniel L. Miller:
> On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > How about: don't address-verify a mailing list that you are subscribed
> > to. Doing so is pointless. Worse, it may cause mail delivery delays
> > when they use VERP-style sender addresses that are different with each
> > mailing
I think there is some misunderstanding here.
On 2013-01-10 01:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > How about: don't address-verify a mailing list that you are
> > subscribed to. Doing so is pointless. Worse, it may cause mail
> > delivery delays when they use
On 1/9/2013 4:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
How about: don't address-verify a mailing list that you are subscribed
to. Doing so is pointless. Worse, it may cause mail delivery delays
when they use VERP-style sender addresses that are different with each
mailing list posting.
Fair enough. How
Daniel L. Miller:
> Is there a way to use the message sender as the address used by the
> recipient verification probe?
The feature is called sender address verification, not sender*AND*recipient
address verification. If it had to send different sender address
probes for different recipients, t
Is there a way to use the message sender as the address used by the
recipient verification probe? Or is the only control a global
address_verify_sender change?
I'm asking because a mailing list I use must have made a change in their
filters, and is refusing the double-bounce sender address fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
