Re: Documentation clarification needed: postscreen_helo_required et al.

2016-03-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:19:58PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > I wrote: > >Only the various enable switches [enable after-220 tests]. > > I understand that this is the actual behavior, but I can't see > anywhere that the documentation makes that clear. This is not for > lack of looking, so it

Documentation clarification needed: postscreen_helo_required et al.

2016-03-19 Thread Bill Cole
In the postscreen(8) man page, postscreen_helo_required is described in the "AFTER 220 GREETING TESTS" and the POSTSCREEN_README says nothing of it. By implication, since it defaults to $smtpd_helo_required, the man page implies that if smtpd_helo_required=yes, any unfamiliar client would be

Re: Documentation clarification needed: postscreen_helo_required et al.

2016-03-18 Thread Bill Cole
On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:32, /dev/rob0 wrote: postscreen_helo_required does not turn on after-220 tests. Nowhere is that stated. As structured, the man page is saying that it *IS* an after-220 test. It can be set to "yes" or "no" independently. Unlike the others, it requires a client to

Re: Documentation clarification needed: postscreen_helo_required et al.

2016-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Bill Cole: > On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:32, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > > postscreen_helo_required does not turn on after-220 tests. Nowhere > > is that stated. > > As structured, the man page is saying that it *IS* an after-220 test. It > can be set to "yes" or "no" independently. Unlike the others, it

Re: Documentation clarification needed: postscreen_helo_required et al.

2016-03-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:47:36PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > In the postscreen(8) man page, postscreen_helo_required is > described in the "AFTER 220 GREETING TESTS" and the > POSTSCREEN_README says nothing of it. By implication, since it > defaults to $smtpd_helo_required, the man page implies