Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record for it.
The IP in question is 63.171.0.212. From my perspective, this IP does
not have a
On 03/04/2013 01:06 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS,
because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR
record for it. The IP in question is
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record for it.
The IP in question is 63.171.0.212. From
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:06:20 -0600
Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS,
because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR
record for it. The IP in
KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host
(in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have rDNS, because
our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking up a PTR record
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
yeah ,my dns cache didnt resolved it
had to be reloaded
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
On Mon, March 4, 2013 6:31 pm, Blake Hudson wrote:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
Does for me. *shrug*
$ dig +noall +question +answer -x 63.171.0.212
Pau Amma wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:40 PM:
On Mon, March 4, 2013 6:31 pm, Blake Hudson wrote:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
Does for me. *shrug*
$ dig +noall
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
resolve?
yeah ,my dns cache didnt resolved it
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
host (in fact several hosts from the same ISP) does not have
rDNS, because
Am 04.03.2013 19:06, schrieb Blake Hudson:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a host (in
fact several hosts from the same ISP)
does not have rDNS, because our DNS (Bind 9.8) returns SERVFAIL when looking
up a PTR record for it. The IP in
question is
Am 04.03.2013 19:46, schrieb Blake Hudson:
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with additional). Did anyone notice that the CNAME does not
/dev/rob0 wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:56 PM:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:31:08PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
KSB wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:13 PM:
On 2013.03.04. 20:06, Blake Hudson wrote:
Just hoping to get a consensus on this. Postfix is stating that a
host (in fact several
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:22:39PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
I still am unsure if it's valid to ask for a PTR record and receive
a CNAME in return. If it is, I assume that CNAME needs to lead to a
valid PTR record at some point.
The way it works: when you query for any type and get a CNAME,
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 1:08 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:46, schrieb Blake Hudson:
Robert Schetterer wrote the following on 3/4/2013 12:37 PM:
Am 04.03.2013 19:31, schrieb Blake Hudson:
OK, so we ask for a PTR on 212.0.171.63.in-addr.arpa and instead receive
a CNAME (with
On 4 Mar 2013, at 14:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
Maybe I am complacent in my expectation that I can ask for an A record
and receive a CNAME in return, but what else would/could one expect -
isn't this the behavior of CNAMEs?
No. A CNAME record provides the canonical name that should be used
16 matches
Mail list logo