Re: FreeBSD-related patch for src/util/sys_defs.h

2009-11-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Sahil Tandon: +#if (__FreeBSD_version = 702104 __FreeBSD_version = 80) \ + || __FreeBSD_version = 800100 It was initially reported to me as available with __FreeBSD_version = 800098. The above suggests that the feature does not exist with 80 __FreeBSD_version 800100. That

Re: FreeBSD-related patch for src/util/sys_defs.h

2009-11-14 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre
Hi, Wietse, what do you want to say with this? any problem for running some postfix release on freebsd? Perhaps I have not received the previous mail... El 14/11/2009, a las 14:17, Wietse Venema escribió: Sahil Tandon: +#if (__FreeBSD_version = 702104 __FreeBSD_version = 80) \ +

Re: FreeBSD-related patch for src/util/sys_defs.h

2009-11-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Please do not top-post. See wikipedia for background information. Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre: Hi, Wietse, what do you want to say with this? any problem for running some postfix release on freebsd? Perhaps I have not received the previous mail... El 14/11/2009, a las 14:17, Wietse

Re: FreeBSD-related patch for src/util/sys_defs.h

2009-11-14 Thread Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre
El 14/11/2009, a las 14:55, Wietse Venema escribió: Please do not top-post. See wikipedia for background information. Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre: Hi, Wietse, what do you want to say with this? any problem for running some postfix release on freebsd? Perhaps I have not received the previous

Re: FreeBSD-related patch for src/util/sys_defs.h

2009-11-14 Thread Sahil Tandon
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote: Wietse, what do you want to say with this? any problem for running some postfix release on freebsd? Perhaps I have not received the previous mail... Sorry for the confusion: although I sent my initial message to the postfix-devel list, I mistakenly left my