Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20220407211920.aedpm%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Wietse Venema wrote in
| <4kz8dy5nbpzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
||To my astonishment, Postfix does not send its own version in a
||policy server request. That should probably be fixed.
|
|diff --git
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4kz8dy5nbpzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> The _only_ thing that must be taken into account, and i would wish
|> postfix would offer a solution for this, is that the *_error_limit
|> configuration parameters kick in. I have drastically low numbers
|>
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> The _only_ thing that must be taken into account, and i would wish
> postfix would offer a solution for this, is that the *_error_limit
> configuration parameters kick in. I have drastically low numbers
> to reduce log noise for all these nonsense connections, but with
>
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20220407172531.ty1l8%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
|The next release (whenever it happens) will have the additional
|manual sentence
|
| Graylisting defers message acceptance a configurable number of
| times via a standardized SMTP response (see RFC 5321,
|
Hello.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote in
:
|On 31.03.22 22:12, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>I hope it is ok to forward this.
|>I have developed and released a postfix protocol graylisting
|>server that possibly could interest some people on this list.
|>I have the hope it proves worth its MTA
On 31.03.22 22:12, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
I hope it is ok to forward this.
I have developed and released a postfix protocol graylisting
server that possibly could interest some people on this list.
I have the hope it proves worth its MTA :-)
The online manual ([2] below) should be enough (so
Hello.
I hope it is ok to forward this.
I have developed and released a postfix protocol graylisting
server that possibly could interest some people on this list.
I have the hope it proves worth its MTA :-)
The online manual ([2] below) should be enough (so note groff HTML
conversion is bad; the
