* Selcuk Yazar selcuk.ya...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We have a rule on header checks file like this;
/^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT Bad Header 92
but last week our staff sen an email an it's subject is
Subject: =?utf-8?B?QsSwWSBNRVNMRUsgRVTEsMSexLAgSEFGVEEgNQ==
thats why this mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2012 09:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Improve the header checks e.g. by requiring a word boundary-
Although I agree, as encoded headers are becoming common place
nowadays, decoding would be a nice enhancement to the header checking
code.
On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
Hi,
We have a rule on header checks file like this;
/^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT Bad Header 92
but last week our staff sen an email an it's subject is
Subject: =?utf-8?B?QsSwWSBNRVNMRUsgRVTEsMSexLAgSEFGVEEgNQ==
thats why
we are turks and we hate sex word :P
thank you all.
selcuk.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Larry Stone lston...@stonejongleux.comwrote:
On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
Hi,
We have a rule on header checks file like this;
/^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT Bad
