On 03/14/2013 05:07 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
Sieve can't call
[- Thu 14.Mar'13 at 12:07:14 -0400 Kris Deugau :-]
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:27:59 +
James Griffin articulated:
[- Thu 14.Mar'13 at 12:07:14 -0400 Kris Deugau :-]
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For
relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use
Dovecot and Sieve. From
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
system user and virtual users with no issue. it receive email and drop
it to virtual user
On 3/14/2013 4:44 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
system user and virtual users with
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:44:26 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan articulated:
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with both
system user and
Thanks guys, i am using dovecot but i didn't knew in technical term we
call it LDA :P. but i thought procmail delivers emails to the
user-folder only, which i misunderstood , if dovecot, procmail and
courier are LDAs as i perceive from you emails. so no problem in
understanding the functionality
Στις , Jerry έγραψε:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:44:26 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan articulated:
i was just trying to understand LDA my understanding with postfix is
that postfix is an MTA and procmail is an LDA to deliver email
however
i am using postfix alone and it is working great. it work with
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
I realize this gets away from Postfix per
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
Sieve can't call outside programs (eg SpamAssassin) by design.
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For relatively
fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot and Sieve. From
what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been maintained in over a
decade.
Sieve can't call
On 2013-03-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For
relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot
and Sieve. From what I can ascertain, procmail hasn't even been
maintained in
Am 14.03.2013 21:04, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
On 2013-03-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Jerry wrote:
Personally, I have no idea why anyone uses procmail. For
relatively fine grain sorting of mail upon delivery, I use Dovecot
and Sieve. From what I can
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 17:07, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Sieve can't call outside programs (eg SpamAssassin) by design. IMO the
inability to call any external filtering programs (even from a
restricted whitelist) makes overall mail filtering significantly harder
By harder I mean that
Am 14.03.2013 21:31, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Reindl Harald wrote:
usually sieve comes AFTER SpamAssassin because it is a broken
setup using a POST queue filter because it results in become
a backscatter and you are usually not permitted by law
accept a message with 250 OK and drop it silent
15 matches
Mail list logo
