On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
As I have said twice now, there is no instance of
On Jun 7, 2019, at 4:41 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 1:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> so possibly the "-x" option for spamass-milter is not a good idea with
>> postfix.
>
> Ok, now that is something too check. Took out the -x and restarted and we’ll
> see how that goes.
I
On Jun 7, 2019, at 1:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> so possibly the "-x" option for spamass-milter is not a good idea with
> postfix.
Ok, now that is something too check. Took out the -x and restarted and we’ll
see how that goes.
On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
As I have said twice now, there is no instance of
> =On Jun 7, 2019, at 2:22 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> Mail comes in. If it passes postscreen then when it is delivered to the user
> a BCC is generated by rbcc.pcre which delivers to the backup account and for
> inexplicable reasons, a DSN is generated for that BCC to root (which is
> aliased to
On Jun 6, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>>> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
>>> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
>>> filter that is misconfigured to use
ss verification. The difference is that 'sendmail -bv' produces
email with "Mail Delivery Status Report", while address verification
reports the result to the verify daemon.
Wietse
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 5:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
>> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
>> filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
>
> As I have said twice now, there is no
On Jun 6, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> This is unequivocal evidence of use of "sendmail -bv". You're reporting
> non-use of "sendmail -v", but "-bv" != "-v". Perhaps you have a content
> filter that is misconfigured to use "sendmail -bv".
As I have said twice now, there is no
Hi nameless
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 12:15:10PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On May 31, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Bastian Blank
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> >> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
> >> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
> >>
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 2:15 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
>>> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
>>> delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (delivers to
>>> command:
On May 31, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
>> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
>> delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (delivers to command:
>>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:29:11AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> mail postfix/pipe[78386]: 45FZmb6nfgzdrvL:
> to=>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.03,
> delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (delivers to command:
> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda)
> mail postfix/pickup[14015]:
> On 31 May 2019, at 00:33, Bastian Blank
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:03:37AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> I am getting mail delivery status reports for every bcc email (that is,
>> every email, since I use a bcc map to create a backup of all the mail).
>
> Then you missconfigured
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:03:37AM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> I am getting mail delivery status reports for every bcc email (that is, every
> email, since I use a bcc map to create a backup of all the mail).
Then you missconfigured something. Mails duplicated by bcc maps are
sent with NOTIFY=NONE,
de of operation is requested with:
>
> % /usr/sbin/sendmail -bv address...
>
> Mail Delivery Status Report will be mailed to .
>
> • What happened: deliver mail and report successes and/or failures,
> including replies from remote SMTP servers. This mode of operation is
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Mail Delivery System wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@hwcn.org
To: r...@hwcn.org
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Report
This is the Postfix program at host barton.hwcn.org.
Enclosed is the mail delivery report that you
Delivery System wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@hwcn.org
To: r...@hwcn.org
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Report
This is the Postfix program at host barton.hwcn.org.
Enclosed is the mail delivery report that you requested
Charles Gregory:
Additional info:
All that shows in the logs is,
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/pickup[14103]: 849CFF4569: uid=0
from=root
Apr 24 08:26:59 barton postfix/cleanup[2161]: 849CFF4569:
message-id=20100424122659.849cff4...@barton.hwcn.org
Apr 24 08:27:09 barton
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation effects, that
is an option that I haven't considered before.
I deleted a very similar
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation effects, that
is an option that I haven't considered before.
I
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:48:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/24/2010 8:39 AM:
- Your mail server is suffering from 100x red-shift due to the
rapid expansion of the universe.
Sending Postfix off into space to study time dilation
] WHAT IS probe Mail Delivery Status Report
In-Reply-To: alpine.lrh.2.00.1004240903060.10...@barton.hwcn.org
from Charles Gregory at Apr 24, 2010 09:07:18 am
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:39:00 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
From
The Doctor:
Speaking of humour, how can you support someone via e-mail
when the e-mail system seens shot?
People with an inoperable mail system can join the mailing list
through some other email account.
Wietse
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Subject: [pfx] Re: WHAT IS probe Mail Delivery Status Report
(sigh) Mea Culpa... I try to remember to remove my list sorting tags
when I reply...
But this time, honestly, I was a bit focussed on the appearance
that my system had suddenly
25 matches
Mail list logo
