[pfx] list.sys4.de doing ARC sign/seal AFTER mailman :/

and i noticed ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu; arc=pass; dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=junc.eu policy.dmarc=reject Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu; arc=pass;

[pfx] Re: mailman mangling (Was: Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?)

This is part of the mbox format, and most likely happens at your end. Yes and no. I sent it out via quoted-printable. |> The Postfix-Mailman interface uses LMTP which requires no such quoting. | |In the local(8) manpage: | |In the case of UNIX-style mailbox delivery, the local

[pfx] Re: mailman mangling (Was: Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?)

Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in > > <20230311005401.bynjz%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: > > ... > > |>From [.] > > This is part of the mbox format, and most likely happens at your end. >

[pfx] Re: mailman mangling (Was: Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?)

Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in > <20230311005401.bynjz%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: > ... > |>From [.] This is part of the mbox format, and most likely happens at your end. The Postfix-Mailman interface uses LMTP which requires no such quo

[pfx] mailman mangling (Was: Re: milter: could it splice (, somehow)?)

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20230311005401.bynjz%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: ... |>From [.] And i know it is not popular among UNIX people, who like it that way, but this "From_" quoting was introduced by mailman (i presume) when it mangled my quoted-printable to something no

Re: Integrating mailman with postfix

> On Feb 9, 2023, at 12:25 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > > Dnia 8.02.2023 o godz. 23:15:37 Doug Hardie pisze: >> >> The message is delivered to a mailbox on the host, not sent to mailman. > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anywhere in your configuration &

Re: Integrating mailman with postfix

Dnia 8.02.2023 o godz. 23:15:37 Doug Hardie pisze: > > The message is delivered to a mailbox on the host, not sent to mailman. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anywhere in your configuration a part that actually would send the mail to mailman. I use mailman on my server, and

Integrating mailman with postfix

domains. My second approach was to install and setup mailman. I am using the instructions from /usr/local/share/doc/mailman/mailman-install.txt. Obviously I am getting something wrong as postfix never seems to send an email to mailman. From main.cf: myhostname is not specified. mydomain

Gnu Mailman, Postfix relay_domains and MySQL virtual domains/users tables

Hi Friends! I've just installed Mailman 2.1.23 on Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.8-0+deb9u1 + Dovecot 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) with "virtual_domains" "virtual_users" "virtual_aliases" on MySQL, and all seems works fine, but not tested on production environment again.

Re: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

On 26.10.17 14:30, chaouche yacine wrote: Make sure you're using the /etc/aliases is actually used as your alias_database alias_database only configures which file is upraded when newaliases is run, nothing more and nothing less. if you want postfix to use the alias database, you must add it

Re: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

10.19] ~ # postalias -q mailer-daemon /etc/aliases >> postmaster >> root@messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # >> >> >> >> On Thursday, October 26, 2017 3:18 PM, James Dore <james.d...@new.ox.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi list, >> >

Re: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

ng correctly : > > root@messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # postalias -q mailer-daemon /etc/aliases > postmaster > root@messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # > > > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017 3:18 PM, James Dore <james.d...@new.ox.ac.uk> > wrote: > > > Hi list, >

Re: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

] ~ # postalias -q mailer-daemon /etc/aliases postmasterroot@messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # On Thursday, October 26, 2017 3:18 PM, James Dore <james.d...@new.ox.ac.uk> wrote: Hi list, I recently migrated our mailman server from an old SLES 11 box to Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, and installed Mailma

RE: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 10:17 AM To: postfix-us...@cloud9.net Subject: Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem Hi list, I recently migrated our mailman server from an old SLES 11 box to Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, and installed Mailman from the Ubuntu repositories along with Postfix and other

Postfix, mailman, and aliases problem

Hi list, I recently migrated our mailman server from an old SLES 11 box to Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, and installed Mailman from the Ubuntu repositories along with Postfix and other prerequisites. Mailman itself is working fine, but I have a handful of regular email aliases in /etc/aliases which do

Re: address extension fails for mailman

It has now been confirmed by the mailman3 team that the map generation for the regexp files in mailman is incomplete. They are working on a solution. For those interested, see my post here: https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/401.

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Wietse Venema: > > Sep 28 08:42:00 ip-172-31-28-174 postfix/local[4413]: B6DAA54DDC: > > to=, relay=local, delay=0.01, > > delays=0.01/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: "abcliste") > > What does this even have to do with recipient_deliter? Your

Re: address extension fails for mailman

> Sep 28 08:42:00 ip-172-31-28-174 postfix/local[4413]: B6DAA54DDC: > to=, relay=local, delay=0.01, > delays=0.01/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: "abcliste") What does this even have to do with recipient_deliter? Your local_recipent_maps

Re: address extension fails for mailman

2017-10-01 22:17 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org>: > Thor Atle Rustad: > > > > > > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > > > recipient_delimiter = + > > > > > > Wietse > > > > > I have had recipient_de

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Thor Atle Rustad: > > > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > > recipient_delimiter = + > > > > Wietse > > > I have had recipient_delimiter = + since day 1. The mailman instructions > call for that. Prove it. Show output f

Re: address extension fails for mailman

the message delivered, which I understand. Now, this is a mailman installation where "abcliste" is found in the local_recipients_map. If I could only make postfix check the local_recipients_map file also when incoming mail has the "+something" extension, I would be good. When incoming ma

Re: address extension fails for mailman

> > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > recipient_delimiter = + > > Wietse > I have had recipient_delimiter = + since day 1. The mailman instructions call for that.

Re: address extension fails for mailman

liste+something is > > expanded > > to user "abcliste" that is unknown > > > > -- > > > > Ok, so if there had been a local user "abcliste" , the "+something" part > would have been ignored and the message delivered, which I understan

Re: address extension fails for mailman

; Ok, so if there had been a local user "abcliste" , the "+something" part would have been ignored and the message delivered, which I understand. Now, this is a mailman installation where "abcliste" is found in the local_recipients_map. If I could only make postfix check th

Re: address extension fails for mailman

On 29.09.17 01:36, thorthor wrote: Here is my main.cf and output in /var/log/mail.log after sending an email from localhost. And here, /var/log/mail.log

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Here is my main.cf and output in /var/log/mail.log after sending an email from localhost. And here, /var/log/mail.log

Re: address extension fails for mailman

On 2017-09-29 10:07, thorthor wrote: This post should contain the log and main.cf. Don't attach, post inline -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html -- Christian Kivalo

Re: address extension fails for mailman

This post should contain the log and main.cf. -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html

Re: address extension fails for mailman

Hmm.. That's why I posted the log and configuration. Seems those parts have been deleted from the post. I'll add it as soon as I get to the office. -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html

Re: address extension fails for mailman

thorthor: > I have a mailman3 installation and postfix. One problem arises when a new > subscriber replies to listname*+token*@klubb.example.com. Postfix doesn't > match the email with postfix_lmtp, and instead rejects the mail as no local > user is found.From postfix log:What have I done wrong?

address extension fails for mailman

I have a mailman3 installation and postfix. One problem arises when a new subscriber replies to listname*+token*@klubb.example.com. Postfix doesn't match the email with postfix_lmtp, and instead rejects the mail as no local user is found.From postfix log:What have I done wrong? -- Sent from:

Re: Relaying issues with Mailman

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 05:25:15PM -0400, Fongaboo wrote: > > Running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE. I am migrating a > listserv on an older box to this one, running newly-installed > Mailman 2.1.20. > > I found a one-pager that showed me what to tar up and move ov

Relaying issues with Mailman

Running Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE. I am migrating a listserv on an older box to this one, running newly-installed Mailman 2.1.20. I found a one-pager that showed me what to tar up and move over to migrate my lists to the new instance of Mailman. Hostname is not changing, so

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

>>> archetecture, at this point, is very low. He tries very hard to help >>> people and to work on it, but I think it is broken at the core. >> >> I am not currently hosting any mailing lists, but I have used mailman for >> many years in the past, and I find

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

rather than SMTP. Don't know >>> whether mailman supports that. >>> >> >> It does, but its use is "highly discouraged". > > Perhaps they have their reasons, I would not be so sure they are the > right reasons, but if their implementations handles

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:32:02PM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote: > On 2/29/2016 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > For submission of list messages to a large number of recipients, I > > would generally use sendmail(1) rather than SMTP. Don't know whether > > mailman supports th

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On 2/29/2016 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > For submission of list messages to a large number of recipients, I > would generally use sendmail(1) rather than SMTP. Don't know whether > mailman supports that. > It does, but its use is "highly discouraged". - Ron

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

; people and to work on it, but I think it is broken at the core. > > I am not currently hosting any mailing lists, but I have used mailman for > many years in the past, and I find this statement is not indicative of the > software I ran. At python.org we currently run ~300 hundred m

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:19:35PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > > To have mailman reinject on an extra port on localhost is > > > how it should be done. Mine uses the same submission smtpd as do regular human users. It is not impacted by any spam control restrictions.

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On 29 Feb 2016, at 2:43, Ruben Safir wrote: Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable security risk? I think not, but I want to double check It's fine, assuming that you can trust everything else running on the host that you're running Mailman and Postfix

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

I am not currently hosting any mailing lists, but I have used mailman for many years in the past, and I find this statement is not indicative of the software I ran. -- No man is free who is not master of himself

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > I can't tell from headers whether they use sendmail.org sendmail > or postfix or something else, but amavisd-new is mentioned in the > headers. amsl.com runs most of the mailing lists. The ietf.org MTAs operated by AMSL run

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

In message <20160229171935.gh12...@mournblade.imrryr.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote: > > > > To have mailman reinject on an extra port on localhost is how it > > > should be done. > > > >

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote: > > To have mailman reinject on an extra port on localhost is how it > > should be done. > > Thanks! Note that much of the delay was likely due to mailman hitting tarpit controls after 10 invalid recipients in a

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

s sensible. That comes near to the configuration i use for > my mailman installation. > > You should not do rbl checks on the mailman -> postfix reinject. > Do that when you accept mail from external sources via port 25 in > e.g. postscreen and afterwards. > > To have mailman reinject on an

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On 2016-02-29 08:43, Ruben Safir wrote: Can I have input about this recommendation? Is there unreasonable security risk? I think not, but I want to double check That looks sensible. That comes near to the configuration i use for my mailman installation. You should not do rbl checks

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

s I asked in my reply at >> <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2016-February/080524.html>, >> post the output from 'postconf -n' and the contents of mm_cfg.py. > > > Sorry, I got mixed up. Its just probably the frustration. Everyon

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

m> >> > >> > Ah - ok I'm learning something at least.. >> > >> > Mostly some address bounces, cruft from the list 4 list sends >> > sandwiched in betweem at 17:17:14 and change. >> > >> > Two things about this bother me. Previous

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

cruft from the list 4 list sends > > sandwiched in betweem at 17:17:14 and change. > > > > Two things about this bother me. Previously with majordomo this > > wasn't a problem but WHY is mailman not marking bounces and > > removing them from the list. > >

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

; Two things about this bother me. Previously with majordomo this > wasn't a problem but WHY is mailman not marking bounces and > removing them from the list. > > I know I am asking the wrong list. As I remember it, mailman doesn't remove an address from a list immediately as it could be a

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

s the Postfix logging that starts around 17:16:09 and that > ends around 17:17:18, for a session that receives mail from Mailman. > > Wietse Ah - ok I'm learning something at least.. Mostly some address bounces, cruft from the list 4 list sends sandwiched in betweem at 17:17:14 and

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

t receives mail from Mailman. Wietse

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:41:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ruben Safir: > > Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough > > When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries > per second from Mailman to Postfix? > >

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

Ruben Safir: > Seems that mailman is unable to send messages to postfix fast enough When Mailman is falling behind, what is the number of SMTP deliveries per second from Mailman to Postfix? Wietse

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

ause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more? > > > > > > > > > > Both mailman and Postfix log activies and errors. I recommend that > > > > > you start looking for warning/error/fatal/panic messages. > > > > > > > > > > Wiets

Re: mailman postfix integration

of the form >> >> there are 38 files in there at preseent >> -rw-rw 1 mailman mailman 4441 Feb 28 16:57 >> 1456690111.419805+dd7dabe9420b90aad8e72ee0607a4eb015fb9976.pck >> -rw-rw 1 mailman mailman 21731 Feb 28 16:33 >> 1456695234.857981+952d2cfb1cfa9559943dc335

mailman postfix integration

On 02/28/2016 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 02/28/2016 07:29 AM, Ruben Safir wrote: >> >> No, I mean I send messages and they don't show up for a half hour even >> in the postfix logs.... > > > Assuming Mailman 2.1.x, the usual cause of this is a backlogged

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

Ruben Safir: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote: > > > > > > > What can cause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more? > > > > > > > > Both ma

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

nto it so much, so I need your help to have a look at it please! > > our server is up and running dovecot/postfix on debian 8 for three years > by now, without any problems. > > I urgently needed to set up some mailinglists and choose mailman for it > (what else?). > > I though

postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

needed to set up some mailinglists and choose mailman for it (what else?). I thought everything went fine till I tried to test my installation and discovered that, when I try to send from an internal emailaddress (managed by the server itself) I get an "User doesn't exist" error and if I sen

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

dead steven i ve just checked, bot variables virtual_alias_maps and virtual_email2email point to the file /var/lib/mailman/data/virtual_mailman, which contains: mail...@lists.ifkuk.org  mailman mailman-ad...@lists.ifkuk.org    mailman

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

configuration file name. I'd have to defer to someone else mroe familiar with Mailman, but do you know if it works to add 'hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/virtual-mailman' to the 'virtual_mailbox_maps' configuration to basically add the mailman addresses in as real addresses instead of aliases, then set up

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

> Mailman requires local(8) delivery via an aliases(5) file that > belongs to the mailman user. With any luck the OP will post actual > configuration details to this list, rather than some website most > readers won't bother to look at, and someone how knows Postfix<->mai

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

Not having used Mailman in a Postfix setup before, I can only speculate a bit. From what I can tell, all your mail is delivering through the dovecot transport and no transport designation is being performed for the mailman address aliases. I'm not familiar with a virtual_email2email

Re: postfix to mailman: User doesn't exist/relay access denied

eone else more familiar with Mailman, but do you > know if it works to add 'hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/virtual-mailman' to the > 'virtual_mailbox_maps' configuration to basically add the mailman addresses > in as real addresses instead of aliases, then set up a transport_maps > configurati

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

HI Ruben, Am 25.10.2015 um 11:09 schrieb Ruben Safir: > What can cause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more? Have you tried to look into /var/log/mailman/error and /var/log/mailman/smtp-failure ? ttyl Django -- "Bonnie & Clyde der Postmaster-Szene!" approved by

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote: > > > What can cause the list mail to hang for 3 hour or more? > > > > Both mailman and Postfix log activies and errors. I recommend that > > you start looking for warning/error/fatal/panic messages. &g

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:43:36AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ruben Safir: > > Hi > > > > I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no > > trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking 3 > > hours to turn over message

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:09:36 -0400, Ruben Safir stated: > I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no > trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking > 3 hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem > with normal email, just when I

Postfix Mailman integration

Hi I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking 3 hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem with normal email, just when I use mailman. DNS is running on the same machine. What can cause

Re: Postfix Mailman integration

Ruben Safir: > Hi > > I have been running majordomo for a decade+ with postfix with no > trouble but I resently turned over to mailman and it is taking 3 > hours to turn over messages. And I don't have this problem with > normal email, just when I use mailman. DNS is r

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPF best practices?

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:13:14 +0900 Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote: That does mean that anybody who can send through smtp.comcast.net can send as a mailbox from your domain and pass DMARC, most likely. I don't see a way to profitably exploit that offhand, though (unless you're a

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:59 PM, @lbutlr krem...@kreme.com wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 06:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld (and any other suggested

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 06:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld (and any other suggested records)? $ dig kreme.com mx kreme.com. 86400 IN

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 16:58, Jim Reid wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address. The only reason for

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:17:33AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 16:58, Jim Reid wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:26 AM, L.P.H. van Belle be...@bazuin.nl wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for your server. It is! No, imo, it is not.. and this setup can

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:26 AM, L.P.H. van Belle be...@bazuin.nl wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for your server. It is! No, imo, it is not.. and this setup can

RE: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

...@postfix.org] Namens Tom Browder Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2015 23:35 Aan: Jim Reid CC: postfix users Onderwerp: Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Jim Reid j...@rfc1035.com wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:06, Tom Browder tom.brow

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:36 PM, @lbutlr krem...@kreme.com wrote: On 16 Aug 2015, at 10:44 , Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a real server and

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a real

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Jim Reid j...@rfc1035.com wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:06, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:06, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for your server. BTW, you will get on a lot better if your postings

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 08/18/2015 06:49 AM, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:55:00 -0500 Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld (and any other suggested records)?

RE: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

- Van: rwhee...@artifact-software.com [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Ron Wheeler Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2015 16:14 Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org Onderwerp: Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration This is pretty common. The DNS does not matter all

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:55:00 -0500 Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld (and any other suggested records)? this is not the best question on this list.

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

This is pretty common. The DNS does not matter all that much as long as people can find the MX server for each domain. The MX record has to point to an A or CNAME that maps to the actual machine where your main service (Postfix) runs. The A or CNAME can be in a different domain as long as that

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Ron Wheeler wrote: The MX record has to point to an A or CNAME that maps to the actual machine where your main service (Postfix) runs. IIRC the MX should not point to a CNAME as target host to make proper loop detection work. Or am I wrong? See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-5.1:

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jim Reid j...@rfc1035.com wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address.

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address.

Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Thanks to Mark Sapiro, one of the Mailman developers, in 2011 I was able to get a set of mailing lists for multiple virtual hosts working, and now I'm in the process of moving to a new server (with the latest versions of Postfix and MM2 installed from src) and want to get a better feel for some

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Tom Browder: On Aug 16, 2015 10:57 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 11:33 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual domains, all of

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 10:57 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual domains, all of which

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a real server and should not be treated as a virtual domain? Nothing of the sort. Just give

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Tom Browder: Thanks to Mark Sapiro, one of the Mailman developers, in 2011 I was able to get a set of mailing lists for multiple virtual hosts working, and now I'm in the process of moving to a new server (with the latest versions of Postfix and MM2 installed from src) and want to get

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 12:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a real server and

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 01:48:46PM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: Nothing of the sort. Just give the machine a sensible hostname that will be used as its smtp_helo_name and is the sole name in its PTR record. Viktor, thanks, but forgive my ignorance . All the domain names I own all point

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 1:59 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote: Nothing of the sort. Just give the machine a sensible hostname Whether that name has anything to do with your virtual domains or not is irrelevant. Pick one of those names if you like, or use some other domain name

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 16 Aug 2015, at 10:44 , Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a real server and should not be treated as a virtual domain? You need a reasonable

  1   2   3   4   >