Hi,
> >> >How does using virtual_alias_maps affect my existing configuration if
> >> >I'm not currently using virtual domains or virtual maps? Currently the
> >> >server is processing mail for one domain listed in relay_domains.
> >>
> >> virtual_alias_maps is processed each time a mail is
>The best course of action is to bounce the messages with a
>relocated_maps entry and force the sender to resend?
"the best" is subjective. using relocated_maps
http://www.postfix.org/relocated.5.html
you make sure people will not receive mail to the old address, and any mail
must be re-sent to
> >The best course of action is to bounce the messages with a
> >relocated_maps entry and force the sender to resend?
>
> "the best" is subjective. using relocated_maps
> http://www.postfix.org/relocated.5.html
> you make sure people will not receive mail to the old address, and any mail
> must be
[note: quoted content modified slightly; it was rejected for some
reason previously]
Not a lot. In as far as this pertains to postfix, just ch-ange the primary
add-ress and add aliases for the old ones. The reply-to address should be set
to the new address.
See virtual_alias_maps and
[note: quoted content modified slightly; it was rejected for some
reason previously]
> Not a lot. In as far as this pertains to postfix, just ch-ange the primary
> add-ress and add aliases for the old ones. The reply-to address should be set
> to the new address.
> See virtual_alias_maps and
Hi,
We hae a set of users who wish to change their account names from
name123@ to just name@ and I'm trying to determine the best way to
manage that. The accounts are set up using actual password/shadow
entries with check_client_access to recipient restrictions. Users
retrieve mail using dovecot.
