On Sep 10, 2017, at 8:36 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> http://blog.lance.tw/posts/2013/08/24/attach-mails-as-attachments-in-mutt/
Thanks!
(I've read a lot of mutt pages and that's the first time I've seen ^D mentioned)
--
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in
> On Sep 10, 2017, at 8:01 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> MUAs should be able to allow users to save "inline" attachments,
>
> MUAs *should* do many things they do not do. Especially the more popular
> ones, which seem to have the least features.
On 10 Sep 2017, at 16:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> MUAs should be able to allow users to save "inline" attachments,
MUAs *should* do many things they do not do. Especially the more popular ones,
which seem to have the least features.
--
Apple broke AppleScripting
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 03:52:14PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 09 Sep 2017, at 21:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > "mime_forward = yes" is not a new Mutt feature, it has been around for at
> > least a decade, however, it is likely still not the default, you have to
> >
On 10 Sep 2017, at 15:52, @lbutlr wrote:
> But this has gone down the rabbit hole enough, I guess.
> On 10 Sep 2017, at 07:25, Alan Dobkin wrote:
>>
>> Alpine (formerly PINE) does all of this and a lot more:
>> https://www.washington.edu/alpine/
Sorry,
On 09 Sep 2017, at 21:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> "mime_forward = yes" is not a new Mutt feature, it has been around for at
> least a decade, however, it is likely still not the default, you have to
> turn it on.
After looking, even with that setting mutt still sends
Alpine (formerly PINE) does all of this and a lot more:
https://www.washington.edu/alpine/
Thunderbird is also a good option if you want a GUI, but not so light on
memory.
You may want to check out Mulberry as well. It's quite old but was one
of the best IMAP clients of its time:
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 9:12 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I'll double check this, but as I recall when i tried to do this in mutt last
> it would only forward the body of the email and if I wanted to include all of
> the attachments (including HTML parts) I had to select them, and
On 09 Sep 2017, at 10:28, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 06:29:40PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Figured someone on the list would have an opinion on a very
>> lightweight feature-poor IMAP client. It doesn't need to do
>> much else but access a single IMAP account and be
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:28:02AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Primary considerations are fast and as light on memory use
> > as possible and usable from a Mac (command-line is fine). I
> > know mutt can do IMAP but I don't think it can forward
> > messages as attachments though I am probably
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 06:29:40PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> Figured someone on the list would have an opinion on a very
> lightweight feature-poor IMAP client. It doesn't need to do
> much else but access a single IMAP account and be able to
> forward emails as attachments. Search would be good,
Figured someone on the list would have an opinion on a very lightweight
feature-poor IMAP client. It doesn't need to do much else but access a single
IMAP account and be able to forward emails as attachments. Search would be
good, but not required. Searching for queueIDs in the Received header
12 matches
Mail list logo