Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-15 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:08:29PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: I'm pretty sure the examples in the postfix docs are for dovecot 1, and not appropriate for dovecot 2. Whilst the first part of this is true, I don't believe the second part is. You should still be able to use a Dovecot 1.x

Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-15 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/15/2013 8:58 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:08:29PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: I'm pretty sure the examples in the postfix docs are for dovecot 1, and not appropriate for dovecot 2. Whilst the first part of this is true, I don't believe the second part is. You should

Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-15 Thread Peter
On 08/16/2013 01:58 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: You should still be able to use a Dovecot 1.x configuration file with 2.x, which will complain in the logs about the changed syntax and suggest that you use doveconf -n to get a proper 2.x configuration file. I'm going to clarify this a bit. This

Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-14 Thread LuKreme
OK, so the old mailserver that I was not allowed to updated much or run ports on because of the fear it would die up and died today. Overall, though it's been hours of restoring from backup and compiling this is still good news because everything is getting built onto FreeBSD 9.2 and at current

Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-14 Thread LuKreme
On 14 Aug 2013, at 20:34 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: So, I think to myself, let's try this dovecot thing again. Well, I got it sorted. Man, this is not a fun time with conflicting documentation and lots of incomplete info out there. However, I am still having one issue. Some users

Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/14/2013 9:34 PM, LuKreme wrote: OK, so the old mailserver that I was not allowed to updated much or run ports on because of the fear it would die up and died today. Overall, though it's been hours of restoring from backup and compiling this is still good news because everything is

Re: Once more around with dovecot

2013-08-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/14/2013 11:05 PM, LuKreme wrote: On 14 Aug 2013, at 20:34 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: So, I think to myself, let's try this dovecot thing again. Well, I got it sorted. Man, this is not a fun time with conflicting documentation and lots of incomplete info out there.