Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Am 06.09.2015 um 12:21 schrieb Benning, Markus: Am 2015-09-05 20:43, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: What I've not yet checked, is whether Fedora (like Debian) has started splitting up Postfix into multiple RPMs with optional databases (LDAP, MySQL, ...) in separate packages, now that Postfix supports

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On 09/06/2015 02:47 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > That's fine. I wasn't trying to pick a fight, or even be contrary. My > question was sincere as I'm always interested in learning. If there are > valid reasons why one should completely avoid building

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Am 2015-09-05 20:43, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: What I've not yet checked, is whether Fedora (like Debian) has started splitting up Postfix into multiple RPMs with optional databases (LDAP, MySQL, ...) in separate packages, now that Postfix supports shared library builds, and dynamic maps. If

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 06:49:19PM +0200, Alex JOST wrote: > >What I've not yet checked, is whether Fedora (like Debian) has > >started splitting up Postfix into multiple RPMs with optional > >databases (LDAP, MySQL, ...) in separate packages, now that Postfix > >supports shared library builds,

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Am 05.09.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: What I've not yet checked, is whether Fedora (like Debian) has started splitting up Postfix into multiple RPMs with optional databases (LDAP, MySQL, ...) in separate packages, now that Postfix supports shared library builds, and dynamic maps. If

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Am 06.09.2015 um 12:21 schrieb Benning, Markus: > It tested it so far that "it worked for me". > As you mentioned shared libs and dynamicmaps needed adjustments. > > I think its best to contact the current maintainer LaMont Jones. > If he is not able to update the package it may be possible

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

2015-09-05 11:07 GMT-07:00 Patrick Ben Koetter <p...@sys4.de>: > is there anyone who knows a download location of Postfix 3.x packages for > RedHat/CentOS 7.x? Hi, Patrick. It's painless to build from source on RHEL 7.x. I keep this RedHat/CentOS blog post updated for the la

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:43:12PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > Building from source on RHEL or respins is _never_ the correct answer. What's right for one isn't always what's right for all. -- Viktor.

Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Greetings, is there anyone who knows a download location of Postfix 3.x packages for RedHat/CentOS 7.x? Regards, p@rick -- [*] sys4 AG https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Steve Jenkins Date: Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 11:13 AM To: postfix users Subject: Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x 2015-09-05 11:07 GMT-07:00 Patrick Ben Koetter <p...@sys4.de>: is there anyone who knows a download location of Postfix 3.x packages for RedHat/CentOS 7.x? Hi, P

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 06:43:40PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > * Viktor Dukhovni : > > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > > > > > for the moment I

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Am 05.09.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter: > Greetings, > > is there anyone who knows a download location of Postfix 3.x packages for > RedHat/CentOS 7.x? > > Regards, > > p@rick > Django has it http://repo.mailserver.guru/7/testing/x86_64/repoview/in

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

Steve, * Steve Jenkins <st...@stevejenkins.com>: > 2015-09-05 11:07 GMT-07:00 Patrick Ben Koetter <p...@sys4.de>: > > > is there anyone who knows a download location of Postfix 3.x packages for > > RedHat/CentOS 7.x? > > > Hi, Patrick. It's painless t

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Viktor Dukhovni : > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > > > for the moment I am still searching for RPMs. You're right! If I need to > > > work > > >

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > for the moment I am still searching for RPMs. You're right! If I need to work > around the packages, your tutorial will give me what I need within minutes. http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=postfix

Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

* Viktor Dukhovni : > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > for the moment I am still searching for RPMs. You're right! If I need to > > work > > around the packages, your tutorial will give me what I need within minutes. > >

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:43 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > Building from source on RHEL or respins is _never_ the correct answer. ...because ?

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 04:50:42PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:43 AM, John R. Dennison > wrote: > > > > > Building from source on RHEL or respins is _never_

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 04:50:42PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 11:43 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > > Building from source on RHEL or respins is _never_ the correct answer. > > ...because ? We don't need to go there... Different strokes for

Re: [Postfix-Users] Re: Postfix 3.x for RedHat/CentOS 7.x

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Viktor Dukhovni : > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > > > for the moment I am still searching for RPMs. You're right! If I need to > > > work > > >