Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Brereton
On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: The only place you should really care about encryption is if your own clients submit SASL authenticated mail -- the far most common auth mechanisms are PLAIN and LOGIN which really should be protected inside a TLS connection.  

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-10-18 1:04 PM, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: Is smtpd_enforce_tls=yes a suitable replacement/substitute for smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes? No, they are two different things. What version of postfix? For current/latest version of postfix I use both:

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/18/2011 12:04 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: The only place you should really care about encryption is if your own clients submit SASL authenticated mail -- the far most common auth mechanisms are PLAIN and LOGIN which really

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Brereton
On 18 October 2011 14:17, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 10/18/2011 12:04 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: The only place you should really care about encryption is if your own clients submit SASL authenticated mail --

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/18/2011 1:24 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: smtpd_enforce_tls is obsolete, instead use -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt This setting will reject all mail from unencrypted connections. The encrypt setting must not be used on a public-facing port 25, but is widely used and recommended on

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-18 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:04:30PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote: Is smtpd_enforce_tls=yes a suitable replacement/substitute for smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes? With smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt (or its legacy form) the smtpd_tls_auth_only feature is arguably reduntant, but it is harmless, and

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-14 Thread Simon Brereton
On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 10/13/2011 6:39 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: smtp_tls_CAfile = ? smtp_tls_cert_file = ? smtp_tls_key_file = ? Typcially these would be set to the same cert keys as used by smtpd. Since these are self-signed certificates,

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/14/2011 1:55 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: On 13 October 2011 20:11, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 10/13/2011 6:39 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: smtp_tls_CAfile = ? smtp_tls_cert_file = ? smtp_tls_key_file = ? Typcially these would be set to the same cert keys as used by smtpd.

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-13 Thread Mark Homoky
On 11 Oct 2011, at 15:54, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: this is obseleted (I'm running 2.7.1) and to use smtpd_tls_security_level = may instead - however, vim tells me that the former is a valid configurable (it's highlighted) whilst the latter is not. That's part of

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/13/2011 5:41 PM, Mark Homoky wrote: On 11 Oct 2011, at 15:54, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: this is obseleted (I'm running 2.7.1) and to use smtpd_tls_security_level = may instead - however, vim tells me that the former is a valid configurable (it's

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-13 Thread Simon Brereton
On 13 October 2011 19:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote: On 10/13/2011 5:41 PM, Mark Homoky wrote: On 11 Oct 2011, at 15:54, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: this is obseleted (I'm running 2.7.1) and to use smtpd_tls_security_level = may instead - however, vim

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/13/2011 6:39 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: smtp_tls_CAfile = ? smtp_tls_cert_file = ? smtp_tls_key_file = ? Typcially these would be set to the same cert keys as used by smtpd. Not needed, you neither ask for nor verify client certs. Should I be? And if so, how do I do that? Bearing

RE: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-11 Thread Simon Brereton
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:15:20PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote: postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem: 25614:error:14094416:SSL

Re: TLS Issues. certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46:

2011-10-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:15:20PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote: postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem: 25614:error:14094416:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:s3_pkt.c:1102:SSL alert number 46: This client could not verify your server certificate, its