Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-20 Thread Alex JOST
Am 19.09.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Bruce Marriner: On Friday, September 18, 2015 04:59 PM CDT, "Bill Cole" wrote: On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:29, Bruce Marriner wrote: So I want to be able to set up Postfix so, if it passes DKIM or other checks that give me a high confidence then just skip the postg

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-19 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Bruce Marriner : On Friday, September 18, 2015 04:59 PM CDT, "Bill Cole" wrote: On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:29, Bruce Marriner wrote: > So I want to be able to set up Postfix so, if it passes DKIM or other > checks that give me a high confidence then just skip the postgrey > stuff > e

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Bruce Marriner
On Friday, September 18, 2015 04:59 PM CDT, "Bill Cole" wrote: > On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:29, Bruce Marriner wrote: > > > So I want to be able to set up Postfix so, if it passes DKIM or other > > checks that give me a high confidence then just skip the postgrey > > stuff > > entirely. > > In what

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Bill Cole
On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:29, Bruce Marriner wrote: So I want to be able to set up Postfix so, if it passes DKIM or other checks that give me a high confidence then just skip the postgrey stuff entirely. In what exactly does a valid DKIM signature give you high confidence? I suspect that this i

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Bruce Marriner
On Friday, September 18, 2015 01:41 PM CDT, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > Since DKIM requires content inspection and you want decisions before > Postfix replies to end-of-data, another option is to use the > smtpd_proxy_filter or smtpd_milters feature (both as before-queue > cont

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Bruce Marriner: > Thanks, I'll read about that tool. I'm pretty new to DKIM/SPF and am > just now trying to set it up. I've been using postgrey for awhile and Since DKIM requires content inspection and you want decisions before Postfix replies to end-of-data, another option is to use the smtpd_p

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Bruce Marriner
ding the chicken and egg problem. > >> > >> -Ursprungligt meddelande- > >> From: Wietse Venema > >> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:50 PM > >> To: Postfix users > >> Subject: Re: Conditional Greylisting > >> > >> Br

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Benning, Markus
an Nielsen wrote: I think he is out after doing a temporary fail after the DATA stage, thus avoiding the chicken and egg problem. -Ursprungligt meddelande- From: Wietse Venema Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:50 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Conditional Greylisting Bruce Marriner:

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Bruce Marriner
en and egg problem. > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > From: Wietse Venema > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:50 PM > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: Conditional Greylisting > > Bruce Marriner: > > I'd like to have DKIM/SPF setup and if an e-mail passed

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Sebastian Nielsen
I think he is out after doing a temporary fail after the DATA stage, thus avoiding the chicken and egg problem. -Ursprungligt meddelande- From: Wietse Venema Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:50 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Conditional Greylisting Bruce Marriner: I'd li

Re: Conditional Greylisting

2015-09-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Bruce Marriner: > I'd like to have DKIM/SPF setup and if an e-mail passed those I want to > to completely bypass greylisting. However, if it soft-fails those > checks then I want it to greylist next. You have a chicken and egg problem. DKIM signature verification requires that Postfix receives th