On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[..]
This is an attempt to describe what it would take to make things
such as header_checks independent of message content order. This
would make multi-header checks possible as a side effect.
[...]
Hi Wietse,
Have a
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:05:06PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[..]
This is an attempt to describe what it would take to make things
such as header_checks independent of message content order. This
would
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[..]
This is an attempt to describe what it would take to make things
such as header_checks independent of message content order. This
would make multi-header checks possible as a side
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
Have a chance to be available the SMTP information inside
header_checks/end_of_header_checks like macros ${client_address},
${sasl_username}, ${sender} and additionally regexp/pcre capability to
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
reinal...@gmail.com wrote:
Another wish is the support to non-terminatives actions (i have
commented few mounths ago)[1].
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg21004.html
Maybe not actualy compatible with lookup
