Re: SMTP-AUTH *without* SASL/PAM?

2009-10-30 Thread Seth Mattinen
Barney Desmond wrote: 2009/10/30 Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us: Keith Palmer wrote: OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question. Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM? I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups. Use

SMTP-AUTH *without* SASL/PAM?

2009-10-29 Thread Keith Palmer
Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM? We're trying to keep things simple here, and I'd really rather prefer to just have Postfix do lookups in a text file or straight from the unix accounts for SMTP-AUTH. Is it do-able? -- - Keith Palmer

Re: SMTP-AUTH *without* SASL/PAM?

2009-10-29 Thread Seth Mattinen
Keith Palmer wrote: OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question. Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM? I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups. Use the dovecot auth method. In spite of the name in the docs, no SASL

Re: SMTP-AUTH *without* SASL/PAM?

2009-10-29 Thread Barney Desmond
2009/10/30 Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us: Keith Palmer wrote: OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question. Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM? I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups. Use the dovecot auth

Re: SMTP-AUTH *without* SASL/PAM?

2009-10-29 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Keith Palmer ke...@academickeys.com: OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question. Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using SASL/PAM? I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups. -- - Keith Palmer ke...@academickeys.com