I'm trying to send root's mail on a linux box to my regular host. In
/etc/aliases I have:
root:my.m...@example.com
If I manually send to my.m...@example.com I get the mail. With the
alias above if I mail root it does not make it.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Leam
--
Mind on a Mission
Am 24.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb leam hall:
I'm trying to send root's mail on a linux box to my regular host. In
/etc/aliases I have:
root:my.m...@example.com
If I manually send to my.m...@example.com I get the mail. With the
alias above if I mail root it does not make it.
Thoughts?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:55:03PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
I'm trying to send root's mail on a linux box to my regular host. In
/etc/aliases I have:
root:my.m...@example.com
If I manually send to my.m...@example.com I get the mail. With the
alias above if I mail root it does not make
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:55:03PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
I'm trying to send root's mail on a linux box to my regular host. In
/etc/aliases I have:
root:my.m...@example.com
If I manually send to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:11:25PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
Thoughts?
The answer is in the logs.
I've run newaliases and reloaded postfix. Here's the config:
The answer is still in the logs.
--
Viktor.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:11:25PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
Thoughts?
The answer is in the logs.
I've run newaliases and reloaded postfix. Here's the config:
The answer is still in the logs.
--
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:29 PM, leam hall leamh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:11:25PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
Thoughts?
The answer is in the logs.
I've run newaliases and reloaded
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:51 PM, leam hall leamh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:29 PM, leam hall leamh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:11:25PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
Thoughts?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:54:58PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
The answer is in the logs.
I've run newaliases and reloaded postfix. Here's the config:
The answer is still in the logs.
Odd...
The answer is still in the logs. Post all the LOGS for a queue-id
that was a mail sent to
As I said, the to field in the mail relay was root@myserver, not
my.n...@example.com.
What, exactly, are you looking for?
Leam
--
Mind on a Mission
Am 24.09.2014 um 21:07 schrieb leam hall:
As I said, the to field in the mail relay was root@myserver, not
my.n...@example.com.
What, exactly, are you looking for?
damned if somebody would know what happens he would
not ask for the logs and if you would understand
what happens you would
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:07:48PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
As I said, the to field in the mail relay was root@myserver, not
my.n...@example.com.
What, exactly, are you looking for?
I thought I mentioned logs...
--
Viktor.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:14 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
what is so hard about *post every line* of the log
related to a specific message instead waste everybodys
time?
Am I the only person who has ever worked in a place that won't let you
post logs on a publicly archived
Am 24.09.2014 um 21:21 schrieb leam hall:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:14 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
what is so hard about *post every line* of the log
related to a specific message instead waste everybodys
time?
Am I the only person who has ever worked in a place that
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
no, but you are the only person even not trying to anonymize
them in a consistent way and not mention that from the very
first begin instead ignore repeated aksing for logs
Understood. The issue is that I don't know
Am 24.09.2014 um 21:50 schrieb leam hall:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
no, but you are the only person even not trying to anonymize
them in a consistent way and not mention that from the very
first begin instead ignore repeated aksing for logs
On 9/24/2014 3:21 PM, leam hall leamh...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I the only person who has ever worked in a place that won't let you
post logs on a publicly archived internet site?
Probably, since there is absolutely no sane reason for such a thing.
Thank you for wasting everyone's time.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:50:35PM -0400, leam hall wrote:
The logs show that the to= field is root@myhost.mydomain on the
server sending mail.
Therefore it seems the transport is not using the local(8) delivery
agent and local aliases(5) don't apply. Proper confirmation requires
logs.
In my
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
You can either post logs and the contents of the transport table,
or solve the problem yourself based on the information provided.
--
Viktor.
Using some of you cached replies from 2007, as well. :)
19 matches
Mail list logo
