Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
Bah, you did mention
mouss put forth on 12/26/2010 4:13 AM:
Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/25/2010 6:06 PM:
Actually, the original proble reported with the previous post namely
connection timeout was resolved. After checking tcpdump, I realized
outgoing smtp port was closed.
But, as it appears, this email was not in vain. I need to use a
different
On 12/26/10 1:58 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 12/26/2010 4:13 AM:
Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppners...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange
I have one last question. Since postfix's header information is most
meaningful, is there a setting that would allow me to strip all the
previous header info (in this case exchange's)?
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/26/2010 7:09 PM:
I have one last question. Since postfix's header information is most
meaningful, is there a setting that would allow me to strip all the
previous header info (in this case exchange's)?
Yes. This was covered somewhat recently on the list, and
Actually, the original proble reported with the previous post namely
connection timeout was resolved. After checking tcpdump, I realized
outgoing smtp port was closed.
But, as it appears, this email was not in vain. I need to use a
different smtpd server. Nevertheless, the 587 server worked
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
Bah, you did mention the Exchange server and I just missed it. The
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
to
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
Bah, you did mention the Exchange server and I just missed it. The 587
is more geared toward MUAs like Outlook and TBird. If you just want to
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
Bah, you did mention the Exchange server and I just missed it. The 587
is more geared toward MUAs like Outlook and TBird.
I am using postfix server as an smtp gateway to exchange server. I
have configured a series of services and filters with postfix. One of
antispam daemons is dspam, content filter. I have configured it to
replace smtp server. Once an email is inspected, it is reinjected for
delivery. I am now
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:01:44PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I am using postfix server as an smtp gateway to exchange server. I
have configured a series of services and filters with postfix. One of
antispam daemons is dspam, content filter. I have configured it to
replace smtp server.
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
to send mail out. Specifically, I would like to bypass all of
the checks done for incoming mail
If you are referring to user submitted mail to be relayed to the outside
world, you
14 matches
Mail list logo
