On 10/19/13 3:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:56:59AM -0500, List wrote:
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which
is an alias to 3000 local users.
What kind of alias? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and with backend
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:20:25PM -0500, List wrote:
What kind of alias? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and with backend database, the database schema
and query used as well as information about available indexes may
be pertinent?
Or are you using local
Am 18.10.2013 17:56, schrieb List:
If so is there a more efficient way to go about delivering
to many thousands of aliases?
By using a mailing list software for that task?
Regards
--
Robert Sander
Heinlein Support GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:56:59AM -0500, List wrote:
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which
is an alias to 3000 local users.
What kind of alias? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and with backend database, the database schema
and query used as
I wanted to confirm the behavior we are experiencing at the moment when
delivering messages to addresses aliased to thousands of local users.
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which is an alias
to 3000 local users. When our inbound spam filter connects to the
Postfix
List:
I wanted to confirm the behavior we are experiencing at the moment when
delivering messages to addresses aliased to thousands of local users.
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which is an alias
to 3000 local users. When our inbound spam filter connects to the
