Solved it :-)
When sending to unknown users, Postfix now rejects the mail with User
unknown in virtual mailbox table, and it does so for hosted (that is,
virtual mailbox domains) domains as well.
It seems the SRS-daemon* I have been using with the main.cf parameters
recipient_canonical_maps
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:09:04 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:real-u...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
RCPT TO:non-exist...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
If non-exist...@cogky.dk is substituted with non-exist...@aptget.dk,
then
On 4/5/2013 6:56 AM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:09:04 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:real-u...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
RCPT TO:non-exist...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
If non-exist...@cogky.dk is substituted with
Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:49:39 -0400 skrev Brian Evans
grkni...@scent-team.com:
Thank you for the link, it was very informative, but didn't solve
the problem. I also tried making a virtual_mailbox_maps MySQL query
that always returned false, but Postfix still accepted all mail,
and then
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:12:40 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Test your lookups:
postmap -q cogky.dk the-virtual_mailbox_domains-table
This should return a result (the value does not matter).
aptget:~# postalias -q cogky.dk
Titanus Eramius:
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:12:40 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Test your lookups:
postmap -q cogky.dk the-virtual_mailbox_domains-table
This should return a result (the value does not matter).
aptget:~# postalias -q cogky.dk
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:12:40 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Test your lookups:
postmap -q cogky.dk the-virtual_mailbox_domains-table
This should return a
Titanus Eramius:
OK, the table is working as it should. Now let's find out
why the bogus recipient is accepted:
Next step:
- Connect to the public (not content re-injection) SMTP port and try
...
MAIL FROM:
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO:real-u...@cogky.dk
250 2.1.5 Ok
RCPT
Le 23/03/2013 00:02, Titanus Eramius a écrit :
[snip]
The goal is a virtual only mailserver, so the domains is stored
in MySQL and fetched through virtual_mailbox_domains. Besides
virtual_mailbox_domains, I use virtual_mailbox_maps and
virtual_alias_maps.
The documentation is among the best
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:31:05 + skrev Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21:35PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I've tried with relay_domains, but it matches on domain-level which
is too much. I then applied relay_recipient_maps, but it don't seem
to
Titanus Eramius:
Besides aptget.dk this server also hosts cogky.dk (among others), and
while unknown recipients is being correctly rejected with a 550 when
sent to aptget.dk, they are not when sent to the other virtual domains.
Instead they are accepted and then returned by the MAILER_DAEMON,
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:55:21 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org:
Titanus Eramius:
Besides aptget.dk this server also hosts cogky.dk (among others),
and while unknown recipients is being correctly rejected with a 550
when sent to aptget.dk, they are not when sent to the other
Titanus Eramius:
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:55:21 -0400 (EDT) skrev Wietse Venema
Where is cogky.dk defined: mydestination, virtual_alias_domains,
virtual_mailbox_domains, relay_domains? It must be only one.
This answer determines where the known recipients must be listed:
Thinking about this, I might have been to specific in my question.
At the fundamental level I would like to have 2 or more Postfix servers
capable of receiving virtual mail for multiple domains, where one of
the servers also handles relaying and local delivery. The rest should
function as backup
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21:35PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
I've tried with relay_domains, but it matches on domain-level which is
too much. I then applied relay_recipient_maps, but it don't seem to
have any effect, which means that addresses is still matched on domain
basis.
Every
Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:31 -0600 skrev Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
...
Nothing wrong with this setup. It's very easy to configure,
requires no third-party software or additional packages, and it's
easy to understand where your mail goes. I expect that's why it's
used as an example
On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:18, Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk wrote:
I plan on upgrading Debians stable Postfix to the current stable
version of 2.10 so I may benefit from postscreen, and that will
probably be a good time to install amavisd-new as a pre-queue filter.
Thank you for the help
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:39:24 +0100 skrev DTNX Postmaster
postmas...@dtnx.net:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:18, Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk wrote:
I plan on upgrading Debians stable Postfix to the current stable
version of 2.10 so I may benefit from postscreen, and that will
probably be a
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:54:02 +0100 skrev Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
On 02/08/2013 06:02 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
So you are...not re-injecting spamassassin
-- Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk [2013-02-09 12:23:38 +0100]:
All of those examples uses sendmail. But again, in relation to Postfix,
it might very well be possible to integrate SA in a better way. Maybe
the method suggested by the docs on content_filters?
On 2/9/2013 5:23 AM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:54:02 +0100 skrev Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
On 02/08/2013 06:02 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
So you
Hi all
Please note that the last time I asked about the behavior of Postfix it
turned out I had misunderstood the concept of relaying mail. It might
be the case again.
I'm running the mailserver that serves this domain + a few others,
the mailserver at ubuntudanmark.dk and the mailservers at
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:06:57PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Please note that the last time I asked about the behavior of Postfix it
turned out I had misunderstood the concept of relaying mail. It might
be the case again.
I'm running the mailserver that serves this domain + a few others,
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:45:07 -0600 skrev /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk:
snip
---
titanus@ntdata:/var/log$ grep 048341743609 mail.log.1
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
pickup(8) picks up mail which was
On 02/08/2013 06:02 PM, Titanus Eramius wrote:
Feb 7 22:12:48 ntdata postfix/pickup[24843]: 048341743609: uid=5005
from=SRS0=3u76=L7=gmail.com=jimmiedcu...@nt-data.dk
So you are...not re-injecting spamassassin traffic, but instead
re-submitting it via sendmail ?
That's weird.
Feb 7
25 matches
Mail list logo
