Hi,
Reading [1], there is a possibility of tuning performace of the Postifx.
For this I wouldn't headers, mime, nested and body checks twice,
configuring another cleanup instance.
But, I have two smtp instances:
- the first receive and send messages from/to internet
- the second receive
Hi,
2009/7/29 Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Reading [1], there is a possibility of tuning performace of the Postifx.
Sorry:
[1] - http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.html#d0e968
[]'s
--
Eduardo Júnior
GNU/Linux user #423272
:wq
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:05 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading [1], there is a possibility of tuning performace of the Postifx.
For this I wouldn't headers, mime, nested and body checks twice,
configuring another cleanup instance.
But, I have two smtp
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Magnus Bäckmag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:05 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading [1], there is a possibility of tuning performace of the Postifx.
For this I wouldn't headers, mime, nested and body
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:38 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Magnus Bäckmag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
[...]
The receive_override_options setting is enough. Multiple cleanup
daemons were necessary before receive_override_options was
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:38 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Magnus Bäckmag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
[...]
The receive_override_options setting is enough. Multiple cleanup
daemons were necessary before
