On 11/18/2019 7:46 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 18 Nov 2019, at 06:04, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
At the same time, there are a _lot_ of anti-abuse techniques for mail that don't
rely on the broad hueristic of, "This TLD seems to suck,” and that don't rely
on establishing that rule as a permanent part o
On 18 Nov 2019, at 06:04, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> At the same time, there are a _lot_ of anti-abuse techniques for mail that
> don't rely on the broad hueristic of, "This TLD seems to suck,” and that
> don't rely on establishing that rule as a permanent part of your
> configuration.
Yeah, but
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:11:22PM +0200, George Papas wrote:
> this still works :
>
> https://www.davidmartinwhite.com/2016/10/25/fighting-spam-block-entire-ttld-with-postfix/
>
To be clear, I believe in, "Your network, your rules." Each operator
should do what s/he wants.
At the same ti
On 11/2/2019 2:38 PM, John Schmerold wrote:
> On 10/24/2019 12:32 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
>>> /\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
>> [Long list… removed]
>>
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
>> check_helo_access pcre:/etc/
On 10/24/2019 12:32 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
/\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
[Long list… removed]
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre permit
/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcr
On 10/24/2019 4:46 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 23.10.2019 o godz. 23:32:44 @lbutlr pisze:
/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre:
/.*\.(com|net|org|edu|gov|ca|mx|de|dk|fi|fr|uk|us|tv|info|biz|eu|es|il|it|nl|name|jp|host|au|nz|ch|tv)$/
DUNNO
/.*\.*$/ 550 Mail to or from this TLD is not allowed
And thu
On 24 Oct 2019, at 04:10, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> On 24/10/2019 07.32, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
>>>
>>> /\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
>>
>> [Long list… removed]
>>
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
>>
On 24/10/2019 07.32, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
>>
>> /\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
>
> [Long list… removed]
>
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
> check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre permit
>
> /etc/postfix/hel
Dnia 23.10.2019 o godz. 23:32:44 @lbutlr pisze:
>
> /etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre:
> /.*\.(com|net|org|edu|gov|ca|mx|de|dk|fi|fr|uk|us|tv|info|biz|eu|es|il|it|nl|name|jp|host|au|nz|ch|tv)$/
> DUNNO
> /.*\.*$/ 550 Mail to or from this TLD is not allowed
And thus you for example would reject all e
On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:20, lists wrote:
>
> /\.asia$/ 510 Denied: Unacceptable TLD .asia
[Long list… removed]
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname
check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre permit
/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre:
/.*\.(com|net|org|edu|gov|ca|mx|de|
23, 2019 1:49 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: block 'new style' TLDs ?
I've had the same problem for some time. I put the following into access_helo
and header_checks. It's pretty severe (and the list gets bigger every month)
but the percentage of valid emai
I've had the same problem for some time. I put the following into access_helo
and header_checks. It's pretty severe (and the list gets bigger every month)
but the percentage of valid email coming from those domains is next to nil.
I use a 510 rather than a 554 reject so hopefully they won't try
* li...@sbt.net.au:
> what's the best way to block that, block entire '*.best' ?
> how and where ?
See http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html . You can
for example use
/\.best$/ REJECT
in a PCRE style sender access file to match envelope sender addresses.
-Ralph
13 matches
Mail list logo
