> On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> "Some sites may blacklist you when you are probing them too often (a probe is
> an SMTP session that does not deliver mail), or when you are probing them too
> often for a non-existent address. This is one reason why you should use
>
"Some sites may blacklist you when you are probing them too often (a probe
is an SMTP session that does not deliver mail), or when you are probing
them too often for a non-existent address. This is one reason why you
should use sender address verification sparingly, if at all, when your site
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
>> probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
>
> reject_unverified RECIPIENT, not reject_unverified_SENDER
Specifically, because it would be
Stefan Bauer:
> reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
> probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
reject_unverified RECIPIENT, not reject_unverified_SENDER
Wietse
> Damn! It was working as documented. Sorry.
>
>
> Am Mi., 16.
reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
Damn! It was working as documented. Sorry.
Am Mi., 16. Jan. 2019 um 13:17 Uhr schrieb Wietse Venema <
wie...@porcupine.org>:
> Stefan Bauer:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
Stefan Bauer:
> Hi,
>
> how can the following error be detected and an instant bounce/reject will
> be send to the sender?
>
> -- 880 Kbytes in 3 Requests.
> root@mx1:~# mailq
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> A97288008B 776694 Sun Jan 13 13:14:29
Hi,
how can the following error be detected and an instant bounce/reject will
be send to the sender?
-- 880 Kbytes in 3 Requests.
root@mx1:~# mailq
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
A97288008B 776694 Sun Jan 13 13:14:29 sender@sender
