> On Sep 25, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> I notice that only outlook out of all my mail clients, use the null mailer
> address. it looks to me after reading the standard - that outlook does it
> right. Is that correct?
Outlook is perhaps the only one that is actually sending
I notice that only outlook out of all my mail clients, use the null mailer
address. it looks to me after reading the standard - that outlook does it
right. Is that correct?
Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>:
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:13
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> I was more asking if it's even a good idea to add the null entry to the
> table? i would like to be a good postmaster but not want to relax policies
> for allowed sender addresses.
You need to allow mail with null return addresses.
I was more asking if it's even a good idea to add the null entry to the
table? i would like to be a good postmaster but not want to relax policies
for allowed sender addresses.
Am Di., 25. Sep. 2018 um 13:26 Uhr schrieb Wietse Venema <
wie...@porcupine.org>:
>
> Stefan Bauer:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm
Stefan Bauer:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_sender
>
> to make sure, my senders only send out with pre-defined and allowed domains.
>
> Now i noticed, that if my users acknowledge "read confirmations" in
> clients, mails in the
Hi,
I'm using smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_sender
to make sure, my senders only send out with pre-defined and allowed domains.
Now i noticed, that if my users acknowledge "read confirmations" in
clients, mails in the following form arrive at postfix:
