Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-10 Thread PGNet Dev
On 6/10/20 2:05 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > It uses the installed SpamAssasssin Perl modules directly, just as spamd does. fact noted. details admittedly i'll have to poke around in. > The socket permissions issues are probably solvable, but if running on the > loopback interface works, > there's

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-10 Thread Bill Cole
On 10 Jun 2020, at 14:37, PGNet Dev wrote: spampd worked well enough, when listening on tcp host:port. listening on socket, i couldn't get past postfix permissions issues, despite similar setup to other policy daemons in use. that makes me a bit antsy. as does not using 'native', up-to-date

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-10 Thread David Bürgin
I’ve been using my own spamassassin-milter (your third option) with Postfix 3.3.0 for a few months and am happy with it. This project is ‘done’, the initial development phase is through, but it is active. (I wrote about the why in these places:)

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-10 Thread PGNet Dev
On 6/9/20 5:40 AM, Marvin Renich wrote: >> https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ >> https://github.com/mpaperno/spampd >> https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter >> >> anyone have any current experience with any of these? > > I also use the first one (Debian package

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-09 Thread Marvin Renich
* PGNet Dev [200608 19:19]: >https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ >https://github.com/mpaperno/spampd >https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter > > anyone have any current experience with any of these? I also use the first one (Debian package spamass-milter) along

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-09 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa
Dnia 8.06.2020 o godz. 16:18:14 PGNet Dev pisze: > >https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ >https://github.com/mpaperno/spampd >https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter > > anyone have any current experience with any of these? I use the first one as it came by

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-08 Thread Tamás Gérczei
I run the dusty one: 'spamass-milt' 0.4, it appears to be working well here. On 6/9/20 1:18 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: > i run postfix 3.5.2 > > i'm > > -- revisiting spamassassin integration with postfix > > -- not interested in amavisd integration or rspamd alternative > > -- looking for lightweight

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-08 Thread Linda Pagillo
Message Sniffer from Arm Research is great and there is a milter version. I have installed it on several Postfix servers with much success. On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 7:21 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2020-06-09 01:18, PGNet Dev wrote: > > >https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ > >

Re: lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2020-06-09 01:18, PGNet Dev wrote: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ https://github.com/mpaperno/spampd https://gitlab.com/glts/spamassassin-milter anyone have any current experience with any of these? spampd is stable, no bad experiences here with it, i just now

lightweight/milter Spamassassin-integtration options for Postfix -- current experience / faves?

2020-06-08 Thread PGNet Dev
i run postfix 3.5.2 i'm -- revisiting spamassassin integration with postfix -- not interested in amavisd integration or rspamd alternative -- looking for lightweight & known to be (still/currently) reliable & active -- ideally, tho not absolutely req'd, milter-protocol -- aware of 3