Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-12 Thread Stefan Bauer
Yes, that's it. Thank you! Am Fr., 12. Okt. 2018 um 14:27 Uhr schrieb Wietse Venema < wie...@porcupine.org>: > That's the probe's 421 result: > > > Oct 11 17:19:13 kop01 postfix/lmtp[5711]: E759E301412: > to=, > > relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:2003, delay=13, delays=0/0.01/13/0, dsn=4.0.0, > >

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema
That's the probe's 421 result: > Oct 11 17:19:13 kop01 postfix/lmtp[5711]: E759E301412: to=, > relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:2003, delay=13, delays=0/0.01/13/0, dsn=4.0.0, > status=undeliverable (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] refused to talk to me: 421 > internal error: OpenResolveAddrFolder failed) >

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.10.18 07:18, Stefan Bauer wrote: But what was postfix reporting to the Appliance that tried to deliver to postfix? search for "smtpd" lines in logs. According to your "unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550", it could be 550. The 421 is what postfix got from the groupware. Not what it

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-11 Thread Stefan Bauer
But what was postfix reporting to the Appliance that tried to deliver to postfix? The 421 is what postfix got from the groupware. Not what it was reporting to the deliverer. Our setup is appliance -> Postfix -> Groupware. The appliance bounced several mails with a 550 5.1.0 Address rejected. Am

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Bauer: > We just noticed, that senders got several "550 5.1.0 Address rejected" > bounces even though postfix logs no permanent errors. > > Oct 11 17:19:13 kop01 postfix/lmtp[5711]: E759E301412: to=, > relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:2003, delay=13, delays=0/0.01/13/0, dsn=4.0.0, >

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Stefan Bauer: we have the following in place: today, we had an issue with our groupware so the following was happening: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[ip]: 450 4.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: unverified address: Address verification in progress; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= Oct 11

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-11 Thread Stefan Bauer
We just noticed, that senders got several "550 5.1.0 Address rejected" bounces even though postfix logs no permanent errors. Oct 11 17:19:13 kop01 postfix/lmtp[5711]: E759E301412: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:2003, delay=13, delays=0/0.01/13/0, dsn=4.0.0, status=undeliverable (host

Re: making unverified_recipient_reject_code safe for temp errors

2018-10-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Bauer: > Dear Users, > > we have the following in place: > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_recipient_domain, > reject_unverified_recipient > unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550 > unknown_address_reject_code = 550 > > today, we had an issue with our groupware so the