> On Aug 16, 2018, at 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Are you assuming that Postfix won't run unless a library with
> the right SOname exists? That is definitely not safe to assume.
>
> It may make sense skip the warning when both versions are known to
> share the same ABI. But that
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2018, at 6:30 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/blob/master/postfix/src/tls/tls_misc.c#L971
>
> I am planning a patch to silence these for Postfix 3.4, and Wietse
> may choose to apply the same to some or all of 3.3, 3.2,
Original Message
From: robac...@fastmail.us
Sent: August 15, 2018 2:51 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: New to Postfix. 3 questions about security functions.
Thanks alot for the comments so far!
>> (1)
>>
>>What do folks here recommend to use?
> On my curren
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 6:30 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/blob/master/postfix/src/tls/tls_misc.c#L971
I am planning a patch to silence these for Postfix 3.4, and Wietse
may choose to apply the same to some or all of 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0.
--
Viktor.
Viktor Dukhovni:
Therefore, if a system is upgraded to OpenSSL 1.1.1, Postfix will
use 1.1.1 without a rebuild.
but the mail log get flooded with ugly warnings:
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/blob/master/postfix/src/tls/tls_misc.c#L971
I do run postfix-3.3.1 + openssl-1.1.1-pre*
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 8:54 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
>> But I don't want to make the mistake of turning it on just to be current, if
>> I then make it impossible to communicate with my servers.
>
> Typically there is no need to "turn on" TLS versions in Postfix, it is only a
> matter of
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 5:51 AM, robac...@fastmail.us wrote:
>
> Back to the TESTing question. How does Postfix notify you if you do?
>
> Only in the error logs? Or some response that I should get as a response in
> my mailer?
I would set:
delay_warning_time = 2h
and if any mail
On 14 Aug 2018, at 23:05 (-0400), robac...@fastmail.us wrote:
Hello,
I'm starting the process of moving my mail from a hosted service to my
own. It'll include a Postfix server.
I got a test server running locally and 'sending & receiving' mail
inside my lan.
Now I'm doing my reading on
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 10:52, wrote:
> That 'trusteddomainproject' sounds a bit more official. Or at least
> broader. But I really don't know. Seems like there aren't a lot of people
> working on it. Or that bugs get the attention they need.
>
That is the home of opendkim and opendmarc (and
Thanks alot for the comments so far!
>> (1)
>>
>>What do folks here recommend to use?
> On my current server, I skipped amavisd-new because sometimes it stalls the
> mail queue. Nor do I run SpamAssassin. I'm happy just using RBLs. I'm running
> opendkim, openspf, and opendmarc.
> Regarding
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 09:32, Gary wrote:
> ...
> I'm guessing you will be using a VPS. I'm on Digital Ocean running Centos.
> But I assume this is a function of what country you reside in. Some
> sysadmins will assume if you are on a VPS, you are a spammed. ATT for
> example. They will
mail queue. Nor do I run SpamAssassin. I'm happy just using RBLs. I'm running
opendkim, openspf, and opendmarc.
Original Message
From: robac...@fastmail.us
Sent: August 14, 2018 8:06 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: New to Postfix. 3 questions about security functions.
Hello,
I'
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 11:53 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> DANE is ready for adoption, with multiple fielded implementations and many
> (312 thousand inbound plus some large ones still outbound only) live domains.
>
> Outbound DANE is simple. Make sure you have a DNSSEC-validating
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 11:05 PM, robac...@fastmail.us wrote:
>
> (2)
>
> Is it time -- in the real-world -- to force STARTTLS yet?
Google reports ~90% of email (volume) inbound/outbound to Gmail uses TLS.
That 10% by volume is probably a larger fraction by count of destination
domains.
Hello,
I'm starting the process of moving my mail from a hosted service to my own.
It'll include a Postfix server.
I got a test server running locally and 'sending & receiving' mail inside my
lan.
Now I'm doing my reading on security issues, authentication, and the like.
I've got stacks of
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Am 29.04.2011 15:09, schrieb Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
there is nothing to confirm
the download-page says 2.8.2
http://www.postfix.org/download.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
* Ravindra Gupta // Viva ravin...@vivainfomedia.com:
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Confirmed!
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:39:45 +0530
Ravindra Gupta // Viva ravin...@vivainfomedia.com articulated:
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
Hi Ravindra,
Please check out: http://www.postfix.com/announcements.html
While you are at it, lose the HTML posting format style.
--
On 04/29/2011 03:09 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
Hi Team,
Please confirm the latest version of postfix.
I'm sorry Dave, I cannot confirm that.
--
J.
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:06:35 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
Your right on the error, but the other part of the thread was about
postfix virtual users, etc which also needed answering.
Please do not top-post. I cannot see any discussion of a Postfix
problem on your system. User management,
What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The new box
is staged (CentOS5), postfix installed via YUM and the config was then
On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:50 PM, lance raymond lance.raym...@gmail.com wrote:
What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:50:08 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The new box
is staged
Your right on the error, but the other part of the thread was about postfix
virtual users, etc which also needed answering.
On Mar 18, 2011 7:39 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:50:08 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
What a way to welcome myself to the group! But
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:59 AM, David Ballano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello people,
I'm new Here, and I have a lot of questions for you, thanks in advance :)
I'm configuring a postfix 2.3 server in a debian etch, I'ts my first
time so I would like to do a simple configuration.
First you
Hello people,
I'm new Here, and I have a lot of questions for you, thanks in advance :)
I'm configuring a postfix 2.3 server in a debian etch, I'ts my first
time so I would like to do a simple configuration.
I've been reading de documentation of postfix.org, believe me.
That is
David Ballano wrote:
Hello people,
I'm new Here, and I have a lot of questions for you, thanks in advance :)
I'm configuring a postfix 2.3 server in a debian etch, I'ts my first
time so I would like to do a simple configuration.
I've been reading de documentation of postfix.org, believe
2008/9/12 Brian Evans - Postfix List [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Ballano wrote:
Hello people,
I'm new Here, and I have a lot of questions for you, thanks in advance :)
I'm configuring a postfix 2.3 server in a debian etch, I'ts my first
time so I would like to do a simple configuration.
29 matches
Mail list logo
