On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote:
On 22/12/11 04:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
or discarded.
There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your
emails are not going through to your customers than when they are
accepted for delivery and *not* delivered. I have very little
On 23/12/11 01:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote:
There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your
emails are not going through to your customers than when they are
accepted for delivery and *not* delivered. I have very little patience
for anyone
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 12:10:10 +1300, Peter wrote:
On 23/12/11 01:53, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/21/2011 5:30 PM, Peter wrote:
There is nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your
emails are not going through to your customers than when they are
accepted for delivery and
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Because this thread has veered off into a general discussion about mail
operation/policy, would you consider taking it off-list or to a more
appropriate forum, e.g. the mailop list?
Agreed. I'm stunned that a tongue in cheek comment of mine has
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 20:19:38 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking
does nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the
noreply-address it is the same as drop
On 12/20/2011 9:19 PM, Peter wrote:
In the case of SPAM the best solution is to deliver the email to
the user's SPAM folder
You must have an unlimited SAN hardware budget for your 1,000,000
mailbox site, if you practice what you preach above. Potential FPs
should be routed to a spam folder,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:35:14AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
if you reject mails to nore...@yourdomain.com you will fail
sender-verify everywhere
This is doable. [Most?] sender verify probes QUIT before DATA, so we
can wait until DATA to reject.
The real solution is not misuse the
On 21.12.2011 15:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:35:14AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
if you reject mails to nore...@yourdomain.com you will fail
sender-verify everywhere
This is doable. [Most?] sender verify probes QUIT before DATA, so we
can wait until DATA to reject.
On 2011-12-21 04:24, Peter wrote:
On 21/12/11 15:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the
On 22/12/11 04:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/20/2011 9:19 PM, Peter wrote:
In the case of SPAM the best solution is to deliver the email to
the user's SPAM folder
You must have an unlimited SAN hardware budget for your 1,000,000
mailbox site, if you practice what you preach above.
No,
On 22/12/11 05:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
On 21.12.2011 15:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
The real solution is not misuse the nore...@example.com *header*
address as an envelope sender address.
The envelope sender, especially for no-reply automatically generated
email, must be a valid mailbox that
On 22/12/11 09:58, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
In postfix' case, address verification does not mean use the SMTP
VRFY command.
It means send a specially-crafted, actual email message and record
whether the recipient is accepted or not.
It is documented in detail here:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much success
following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
- Add a blackhole alias in /etc/aliases (blackhole: /dev/null),
* Roberto Greiner robe...@nead.unesp.br:
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much
success following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
- Add a blackhole alias
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 12:35:40 Roberto Greiner wrote:
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much
success following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a
-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
-
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Why do you want to do that? What would be wrong with
rejecting that address?
/dev/null is just the proper repository to recycle bits. We don't want to
run out. =^_^=
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's
On 21/12/11 10:11, Dennis Carr wrote:
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's case, it's going to a noreply address, and I've seen cases
where nore...@foo.bar is simply eaten, more often than not, rather than
rejected. Besides, as far as I'm concerned,
Am 21.12.2011 00:47, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 10:11, Dennis Carr wrote:
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's case, it's going to a noreply address, and I've seen cases
where nore...@foo.bar is simply eaten, more often than not, rather than
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am not excusing the sender's actions, I am
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am
On 12/20/2011 6:29 PM, Peter wrote:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am not
On 21/12/11 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The act of delivery to a mailbox does not guarantee the message will be
read by a human, nor replied to, ever. Thus there is zero practical
difference, from the sender's POV, in this case, between delivering to
/dev/null and to a mailbox whose contents
On 21/12/11 15:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the
23 matches
Mail list logo
