On 2 November 2011 18:23, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 11/2/2011 2:33 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
The checks above permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated
are checks you want applied to your networks and authenticated
users. Generally it's better to put those checks in
On 11/3/2011 9:28 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
So, these should be fine anywhere be fine anywhere before
reject_unauth_destination...
reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
reject_unknown_helo_hostname,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
On 1 November 2011 18:53, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 11/1/2011 1:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Googling led me to this thread:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_helo_access
On 2 November 2011 15:53, James Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
postconf.5 says it will
Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the
recipient domain, and the RCPT TO domain has no DNS A
Simon Brereton:
On 2 November 2011 16:26, James Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
postconf.5 says it will
Reject the request when
On 11/2/2011 2:33 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
The checks above permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated
are checks you want applied to your networks and authenticated
users. Generally it's better to put those checks in
smtpd_sender_restrictions.
But I thought the recommended best
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Googling led me to this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/210413
But I don't understand how myu...@example.com is not owned by
myu...@example.com
On 11/1/2011 1:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Googling led me to this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/210413
But I don't understand how myu...@example.com
Hi
I was evaluating my smptd_recipient_restrictions last week and decided that it
made no sense to have reject_sender_login_mismatch after
permit_sasl_authenticated. So I changed it. At the time I was reviewing the
documentation I wasn't able to figure out the difference between
On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Hi
I was evaluating my smptd_recipient_restrictions last week and decided that
it made no sense to have reject_sender_login_mismatch after
permit_sasl_authenticated. So I changed it. At the time I was reviewing the
documentation I wasn't
On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Hi
I was evaluating my smptd_recipient_restrictions last week and decided that
it made no sense to have reject_sender_login_mismatch after
permit_sasl_authenticated. So I
13 matches
Mail list logo
