lists skrev den 2019-12-12 03:08:
Seriously is there ever a case not to use port 587?
On 12.12.19 08:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
depends on content filtering, if all clients is local all can use port
25
even in this case separation of submission port can help much.
I prefer postscreen and
lists skrev den 2019-12-12 03:08:
Seriously is there ever a case not to use port 587?
depends on content filtering, if all clients is local all can use port
25
Jason R Cowart skrev den 2019-12-12 01:10:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_client_access
cidr:/etc/postfix/access/restricted-local-only.cidr,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access/recipient,
Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
make check_resipient_access reused in
Seriously is there ever a case not to use port 587?
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:10:07AM +, Jason R Cowart wrote:
> We're moving to a configuration that will leverage the check_sasl_access
> option to allow only those granted access to authenticate from outside the
> local network and relay mail.
Your submission users should be using port 587,
We're moving to a configuration that will leverage the check_sasl_access option
to allow only those granted access to authenticate from outside the local
network and relay mail.
This are mostly working (at least amongst the list of users allowed to
send--we'll evaluate the types of things
