Re: Debian Postfix chroot and syslog problem -- was slightly OT: size data

2009-10-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > greer:/etc/rsyslog.d# cat postfix.conf > # Create an additional socket in postfix's chroot in order not to break > # mail logging when rsyslog is restarted. If the directory is missing, > # rsyslog will silently skip creating the socket. > $AddUnixListenSocket /var/spool/postfix/d

Debian Postfix chroot and syslog problem -- was slightly OT: size data

2009-10-15 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 9/28/2009 7:56 AM: > The problem is using a chroot environment without syslog socket. > >>> Now PLEASE go beat up the maintainers who ship Postfix in a broken >>> configuration. The more people compolain, the more likely that it >>> will get fixed, >> I will surely do s

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Wietse Venema put forth on 9/28/2009 5:26 AM: > > >> If the chroot environment does not contain the required syslog socket, > >> then why does qmgr place a stamp in the log for some message > >> transactions and not others? > > >

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 9/28/2009 5:26 AM: >> If the chroot environment does not contain the required syslog socket, >> then why does qmgr place a stamp in the log for some message >> transactions and not others? > > Oh, ye of little faith. Ye of not enough understanding of the subject (me) i

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 8:30 AM: > > Stan Hoeppner: > >> Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 7:39 AM: > >>> If you have a question about POSTFIX logs, then it is a good idea > >>> to send samples of POSTFIX logging. > >> Point taken, sry Wietse. Upon grabbing these

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 8:30 AM: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 7:39 AM: >>> If you have a question about POSTFIX logs, then it is a good idea >>> to send samples of POSTFIX logging. >> Point taken, sry Wietse. Upon grabbing these sample entries, I noticed >

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 7:39 AM: > > If you have a question about POSTFIX logs, then it is a good idea > > to send samples of POSTFIX logging. > > Point taken, sry Wietse. Upon grabbing these sample entries, I noticed > the transactions pflogsumm is flagging have no

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 9/27/2009 7:39 AM: > If you have a question about POSTFIX logs, then it is a good idea > to send samples of POSTFIX logging. > > Wietse Point taken, sry Wietse. Upon grabbing these sample entries, I noticed the transactions pflogsumm is flagging have no qmgr en

Re: slightly OT: size data

2009-09-27 Thread Wietse Venema
If you have a question about POSTFIX logs, then it is a good idea to send samples of POSTFIX logging. Wietse

slightly OT: size data

2009-09-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Hi all, Until a day or two ago I'd never seen this in my pflogsumm output: Messages with no size data -- 03B593DA160 redac...@hardwarefreak.com 0E4283DA160 redac...@hardwarefreak.com 118663DA160 redac...@hardwarefreak.com 1D5973DA160 redac...@hardwarefreak.com 1E