On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 23:39 +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
ram wrote:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
bijayant kumar wrote:
One thing more that the manpage of addresses(5) says
Do not use ASCII control characters. Avoid spaces and the
characters\()[],;:
I want to ask that are they all be treated as Non-Ascii
characters or any thing else? If you could clarify the
same it will be very
Salaam,
Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce the message with the
appropriate
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
configure
Barney Desmond:
This is what we thought *should* work, but apparently it doesn't. I'd
love to be told that it actually works.
1. Add an extra smtp service to master.cf:
smtphotmailinet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.2
2. Add a
Rajkumar S wrote:
Hi,
How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains
temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but not
deliver them till it's told to.
See http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#defer_transports
Brian
Muhammed Sameer a écrit :
Salaam,
Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce the
Muhammed Sameer schrieb:
Salaam,
Hello everyone, Can I write a postfix check myself?
Actually, I want postfix to check for the quota and status of the user in a
database, and if the user is overquota or if the status of the user is
suspended, I want postfix to accordingly bounce the
Le 25 nov. 08 à 05:42, ram a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:04 +0100, bsd wrote:
Hello folks,
I am actually working for an African country where the electricity is
not as stable as one could expect - even in the infrastructure of the
historical telco operator…
With all the care that we
ram:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can
ram wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 23:39 +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
You'd think you could create extra smtp-service instances in master.cf
and bind them to different addresses with -o smtp_bind_address=a.b.c.d,
then use transport maps to fiddle with them, but this apparently doesn't
work.
Hello,
Thanks for your time and suggestion will sure try that out.
Regards,
Muhammed Sameer
--- On Wed, 11/26/08, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Customized Postfix Check
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date:
Hello,
Thank you Jan, thanks for your suggestion!
Regards,
Muhammed Sameer
--- On Wed, 11/26/08, Jan P. Kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan P. Kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Customized Postfix Check
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, November 26,
Ok here is the problem. My postfix server is the front end for 2 exchange
servers running Symantec Mail Security with spam filtering. The most
important thing is to cut down the spam as much as possible. We go to great
pains to maintain a proper list of recipients so we don't have User
Unknown
Am Wednesday 26 November 2008 18:15:05 schrieb LaGatorVII:
snip
...
I see two possible solutions, both of which I am not savvy enough to do on
my own:
1) Some setting or filter in Postfix to not generate a bounce message when
an email is rejected for the above reason.
And what about a
Dear postfix developers,
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
Cheers, Jan
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:15:05AM -0800, LaGatorVII wrote:
Ok here is the problem. My postfix server is the front end for 2 exchange
servers running Symantec Mail Security with spam filtering. The most
important thing is to cut down the spam as much as possible. We go to great
pains to
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
two
solutions:
...
2. Use header_checks like this
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
two
solutions:
...
2. Use
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:16:59AM -0700, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
two
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:48:31PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp
Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp
session? Background is the current development of
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:44 -0700, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:53 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:58:25PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
The space just before the final / should not be there. Postfix added
Received headers (for network-originated traffic) match (PCRE):
/^Received:
[ ] from [ ] \S+# Helo name
[ ] \(\S+ [ ]
Hi all,
just to be sure anyone want's to strip routes away knows what he/she is doing:
From: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
If source routes are stripped, this practice will cause failures.
Don't strip routes/paths 'til you are working on internet. It is
dangerous and it's not
Dario Cavallaro a écrit :
Hi all,
just to be sure anyone want's to strip routes away knows what he/she is doing:
From: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
If source routes are stripped, this practice will cause failures.
Don't strip routes/paths 'til you are working on internet. It is
Hi, I have a postfix 2.3.3 system being used for redirection purposes
during a migration from sendmail to postfix.
let call this system postfix1 (192.168.10.10) , the new postfix system
is postfix2 (192.168.10.20) and the old system is sendmail1
(192.168.10.30)
I am using a combination of
Erick Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have a postfix 2.3.3 system being used for redirection purposes
during a migration from sendmail to postfix.
let call this system postfix1 (192.168.10.10) , the new postfix system
is postfix2 (192.168.10.20) and the old system is sendmail1
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header by your-MTA is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Jan P. Kessler:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header by your-MTA is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Perhaps it is because
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:45:53PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jan P. Kessler:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header by your-MTA is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not
32 matches
Mail list logo
