Hi List,
Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
So our server accepts mail, does some spam and virus checking and
delivers the mail to a remote server. Of course I don't want to accept
mail for non existing users so our mailserver verifies the recipient. So
far
Hi, I'm confused about how works the map tables in Postfix, I'm using the
2.4.1 version.
I have setup the virtual_mailbox_domains to return the domain names, for
that we are the final destination and I have also setup the
virtual_alias_maps for trivial rewrite of some addresses.
My problem:
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 at 19:43 CEST,
rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
OK here's how far I've gone:
master.cf:
smsnotif unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail argv=/root/smsnotif ${recipient}
/root/smsnotif:
#!/bin/sh
echo $@
Wietse Venema wrote:
You forgot to test the virtual alias expansion.
postmap -q u...@example.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual.cf
Thus should produce the same result as a hash: table with:
u...@example.comu...@example.com, u...@sms.example.com
Ditto for the transport map.
Hi,
Upgraded Ubuntu recently and one of our users is now complaining that mail
forwarded to his freeserve account isn't downloading correctly with them.
There does seem to have been one change in the the forwarded mail since the
update.
Before the update the Envelope-to: header contained the users
rihad wrote:
Now that I've fixed table lookup following from Magnus' advice, all is
working!
# postmap -q ri...@example.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual.cf
ri...@example.com,ri...@sms.example.com
The query now looks like this:
query = select
I'm having a problem with a service provider's emails. While in my older
server (and another postfix server I have, call it S2) I have no problems
with receiving emails, on this new postfix server I've set up I have this
issue:
- Mail is stored without a 'Date:' header, making some MUA not
Hi all.
postfix-2.6.5.
Part users put mail on mailboxes, another part forwarding to different
domain.
virtual_mailbox_domains = ulgsm.ru
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases.mysql
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mailboxes.mysql
work fine.
first checks
Hi,
the documentation wasnt clear about this. Is it possible to use multiple
check_client_access in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
i.e (example).
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/rbl_checks
Martijn de Munnik:
Hi List,
Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
So our server accepts mail, does some spam and virus checking and
delivers the mail to a remote server. Of course I don't want to accept
mail for non existing users so our mailserver
wild_oscar:
I'm having a problem with a service provider's emails. While in my older
server (and another postfix server I have, call it S2) I have no problems
with receiving emails, on this new postfix server I've set up I have this
issue:
- Mail is stored without a 'Date:' header, making
al...@ulgsm.ru:
Oct 22 13:03:34 skuns postfix/cleanup[46220]: warning: table
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases.mysql: empty lookup result for:
al...@ulgsm.ru -- ignored
Fix that.
Wietse
Alberto Lepe:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Alberto Lepe:
host mail.server_old.com[101.101.101.101] said: 554 5.0.0 rewrite:
excessive recursion (max 50), ruleset canonify
That is not a
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we for now I
Hi All,
I was wondering if I can accept only those emails addressed to the users listed
in a table of my application database.
Can anybody suggest smthing.
Thanks,
Sumit Arora
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2009-10-22 06:40:01 -0400]:
al...@ulgsm.ru:
Oct 22 13:03:34 skuns postfix/cleanup[46220]: warning: table
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases.mysql: empty lookup result for:
al...@ulgsm.ru -- ignored
Fix that.
It is not problem.
al...@ulgsm.ru not
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Alberto Lepe:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
Alberto Lepe:
host mail.server_old.com[101.101.101.101] said: 554
* Ключников А.С. al...@ulgsm.ru:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2009-10-22 06:40:01 -0400]:
al...@ulgsm.ru:
Oct 22 13:03:34 skuns postfix/cleanup[46220]: warning: table
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases.mysql: empty lookup result for:
al...@ulgsm.ru -- ignored
Fix
Dear All,
Today, I had to open my Postfix mailer to one IP address. Though,
right now I am accepting any mail coming from that IP address, but I
want to restrict it to some specific email id.
Is it possible to restrict to an email id like webmas...@domain from
that IP 10.20.30.40 and
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:03 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 06:35 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Martijn de Munnik:
Hi List,
Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus gateway.
So our server accepts mail, does some spam and virus checking and
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de [2009-10-22 13:08:57 +0200]:
* Ключников А.С. al...@ulgsm.ru:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2009-10-22 06:40:01 -0400]:
al...@ulgsm.ru:
Oct 22 13:03:34 skuns postfix/cleanup[46220]: warning: table
On 10/22/2009 6:15 AM, Anant Athavale wrote:
Dear All,
Today, I had to open my Postfix mailer to one IP address. Though, right
now I am accepting any mail coming from that IP address, but I want to
restrict it to some specific email id.
Is it possible to restrict to an email id like
On 10/22/2009 5:33 AM, Harakiri wrote:
Hi,
the documentation wasnt clear about this. Is it possible to use multiple
check_client_access in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
i.e (example).
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination
check_client_access
On 10/22/2009 2:35 AM, Tomas Macek wrote:
Hi, I'm confused about how works the map tables in Postfix, I'm using
the 2.4.1 version.
I have setup the virtual_mailbox_domains to return the domain names
When you use a table for virtual_mailbox_domains, it must not
return a list of domains.
Hello,
I have setup a receiving Postfix mail server. Here i have custom code written
that parses the whole mail received by postfix and use the headers, body and
attachments separately for different uses.
I have currently added SPF and DKIM checks in postfix that result in appending
of their
Hello,
I have setup a Postfix mail server for incoming mails that is required to never
reply to external enviornment i.e it will accept all incoming mails and never
reply anything that can be used as a trace to locate and verify it's existence.
I have implemented the Postfix anti-UCE
On Oct 22, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Sharma, Ashish ashish.shar...@hp.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have setup a receiving Postfix mail server. Here i have custom
code written that parses the whole mail received by postfix and use
the headers, body and attachments separately for different uses.
I have
Eric Vaughn put forth on 10/5/2009 8:23 PM:
OLD NEW
Centos 5.0. Centos 5.3 (yum update all)
i386. x64
2.4 ghrz cpu. 2.83 ghrz cpu
Hi Eric,
Would you please provide the following:
1. Each server make/model#
2. CPU
Sahil,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
my requirement is to setup a silent Postfix mail server that just receives mail
and never responds any kind of information etc so that the existence of my mail
server can be known.
Obviously I need to secure my mail server from spam mails , so I need to
al...@ulgsm.ru:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de [2009-10-22 13:08:57 +0200]:
* ? ?.?. al...@ulgsm.ru:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Martijn de Munnik:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:03 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 06:35 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Martijn de Munnik:
Hi List,
Some of our customers use our mailservers as antispam/antivirus
Yes, that's what I returning now: not found - the domain was not found in
the virtual_mailbox_domains table
Tomas
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/22/2009 2:35 AM, Tomas Macek wrote:
Hi, I'm confused about how works the map tables in Postfix, I'm using
the 2.4.1 version.
I
ram:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is the right thing , but
we
On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:50 AM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to
send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is
Hi,
We are experiencing rather frequent mail deferrals because of a
milter-related malfunction:
Oct 22 08:48:14 mailhost3 postfix/smtpd[723]: 23C7F8FF16:
client=xxx.xxx[1.2.3.4]
Oct 22 08:48:14 mailhost3 postfix/cleanup[1415]: 23C7F8FF16: message-id=
Oct 22 09:18:16 mailhost3
On 10/22/2009 8:34 AM, Tomas Macek wrote:
Yes, that's what I returning now: not found - the domain was not found
in the virtual_mailbox_domains table
Do not top post.
If you require more help, please see
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 22/10/09 12:49, Arora, Sumit wrote:
I was wondering if I can accept only those emails addressed to the users
listed in a table of my application database.
It depends on your application database :) ;) and if it can be used as a
map.
- --
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:15:56AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Eric Vaughn put forth on 10/5/2009 8:23 PM:
OLD NEW
Centos 5.0. Centos 5.3 (yum update all)
i386. x64
2.4 ghrz cpu. 2.83 ghrz cpu
Hi Eric,
Would you
K bharathan put forth on 10/21/2009 12:08 PM:
hi all
i've to keep two postfix mail server; one at head office and another at
regional office;
both users will be using example.com http://example.com domain; head
office mail server has got hostname/ mx/rdns etc..in the public dns;
head office
David Schweikert:
Hi,
We are experiencing rather frequent mail deferrals because of a
milter-related malfunction:
Oct 22 08:48:14 mailhost3 postfix/smtpd[723]: 23C7F8FF16:
client=xxx.xxx[1.2.3.4]
Oct 22 08:48:14 mailhost3 postfix/cleanup[1415]: 23C7F8FF16: message-id=
Oct 22
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:32:16 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix does not enforce timeouts - instead, Postfix depends on
the kernel to do the job. When Postfix wants to read, it waits for
$timeout seconds for the socket to become readable. When the kernel
reports the socket is readable but
Arora, Sumit put forth on 10/22/2009 5:49 AM:
I was wondering if I can accept only those emails addressed to the users
listed in a table of my application database.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_recipient_restrictions
--
Stan
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:48:49PM +0200, David Schweikert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:32:16 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix does not enforce timeouts - instead, Postfix depends on
the kernel to do the job. When Postfix wants to read, it waits for
$timeout seconds for the socket
On 10/22/2009 7:53 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hello,
I have setup a Postfix mail server for incoming mails that is required
to never reply to external enviornment i.e it will accept all incoming
mails and never reply anything that can be used as a trace to locate and
verify it's existence.
Sharma, Ashish put forth on 10/22/2009 7:53 AM:
Hello,
I have setup a Postfix mail server for incoming mails that is required
to never reply to external enviornment i.e it will accept all incoming
mails and never reply anything that can be used as a trace to locate and
verify it's
Victor Duchovni put forth on 10/22/2009 10:20 AM:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:15:56AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Eric Vaughn put forth on 10/5/2009 8:23 PM:
OLD NEW
Centos 5.0. Centos 5.3 (yum update all)
i386. x64
2.4 ghrz cpu.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:45:31PM +0200, Roland Dirlewanger wrote:
Why do you expect clients on port 25 to have client certificates?
In my opinion, as soon as a non anonymous TLS connection is set up between
a client and a server, it is legitimate for both sides to verify whom
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
There is really no need to pursue this at this time. No evidence has
yet been found to support the new system being slower than the old.
I think you've demonstrated it's not slower. I'm wondering why it's not
faster,
In a
Stan Hoeppner:
I think you've demonstrated it's not slower. I'm wondering why it's not
faster, vs what you described as about equal, in performance. Granted,
More than 25 years ago people discovered that it is incredibly hard
to spread one program over multiple CPUs such that it keeps every
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'll implement the regexp to edit command code anyway. It's
cheaper than sending someone to a customer next time.
Would this eg. also allow to substitute
Victor Duchovni put forth on 10/22/2009 11:41 AM:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
There is really no need to pursue this at this time. No evidence has
yet been found to support the new system being slower than the old.
I think you've demonstrated it's not
Geert Hendrickx:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:06AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'll implement the regexp to edit command code anyway. It's
cheaper than sending someone to a customer next time.
Would this eg. also allow to substitute domains (s/@olddomain$/@newdomain$/)
in RCPT TO,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 01:34:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also, the RCPT TO command shows the address in raw form, so
the same address may appear in different but equivalent forms:
RCPT TO:u...@example.com
RCPT TO:user@example.com
The second is not RFC compliant, quoted-strings are
Wietse Venema put forth on 10/22/2009 12:04 PM:
Stan Hoeppner:
I think you've demonstrated it's not slower. I'm wondering why it's not
faster, vs what you described as about equal, in performance. Granted,
More than 25 years ago people discovered that it is incredibly hard
to spread one
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:52:36 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Which version? All recommended patch sets applied?
We have Solaris 10 (kernel patch 13-03, dated January 2009).
I did now a tcpdump during another such case and I found out that this
is happening during the DATA phase: the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:46:55PM +0200, David Schweikert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:52:36 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Which version? All recommended patch sets applied?
We have Solaris 10 (kernel patch 13-03, dated January 2009).
I did now a tcpdump during another such
David Schweikert:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:52:36 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Which version? All recommended patch sets applied?
We have Solaris 10 (kernel patch 13-03, dated January 2009).
I did now a tcpdump during another such case and I found out that this
is happening during
Stan Hoeppner:
running at 1/4 speed (I'm only getting 3MB/sec whereas with the
[...] kernel they are getting 14-18MB/sec)
I hope you have those numbers mixed up, and that you meant to write
45MB/s with a good driver and 15MB/s with a bad one. With single-disk
sequential file access of uncached
For our problem, Postfix was not the issue.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:25 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix 2.6.x slow
Stan Hoeppner:
running
Guy a écrit :
Hi,
Upgraded Ubuntu recently and one of our users is now complaining that
mail forwarded to his freeserve account isn't downloading correctly with
them.
There does seem to have been one change in the the forwarded mail since
the update.
Before the update the Envelope-to:
Sharma, Ashish a écrit :
Sahil,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
my requirement is to setup a silent Postfix mail server that just receives
mail and never responds any kind of information etc so that the existence of
my mail server can be known.
Obviously I need to secure my mail server
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 17:04:50 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtpd_timeout is no MESSAGE TRANSFER time limit.
smtpd_timeout is an INACTIVITY time limit.
OK, I get it :-) Thanks for the explanation. I did solve my problem by
increasing the timeout in the milter.
Cheers
David
Wietse Venema put forth on 10/22/2009 4:25 PM:
Stan Hoeppner:
running at 1/4 speed (I'm only getting 3MB/sec whereas with the
[...] kernel they are getting 14-18MB/sec)
I hope you have those numbers mixed up, and that you meant to write
45MB/s with a good driver and 15MB/s with a bad one.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Alberto Lepe d...@alepe.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.orgwrote:
Alberto Lepe:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
64 matches
Mail list logo
