Hi,
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with postfix 2.7.0
I have suddenly discovered a lot of the following in some of my mailservers (
5) mail.logs:
Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
hash:/etc/postfix/myrelaydomains(0,lock|fold_fix) has changed – restarting
Mar 19
Am 25.03.2011 09:59, schrieb Peter Sørensen:
I have a set of function which among others will create the myrelaydomains
from
a mysql DB table and then postmap hash: myrelaydomains
why in the world are you not using the mysql-table directly in postfix
but this should’nt be called on a
Am 25.03.2011 00:15, schrieb Murray S. Kucherawy:
MTA history goes back to sendmail, which had three main modes for injecting a
message:
1) sendmail user@host
[message header and body here]
[. or EOF]
2) sendmail -t
[message header and body here]
[. or EOF]
Both commands
I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
performance issue
concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround for
the mysql problems.
/Peter
Fra: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
Hello
We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
to validate students registrations.
For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
each sent email.
I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to send a
copy to another administrative email address :
in the sender_bcc_maps map I have
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
to validate students registrations.
For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
each sent email.
I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to send a
copy to another administrative email
On 03/25/2011 10:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
Hello
We have an inhouse application that deliver emails
to validate students registrations.
For adminitrative purpose we nedd to keep a copy of
each sent email.
I activated the sender_bcc_maps feature to
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
Thank you Ralf .
The * entry is not required, that's what default_transport is for. If
you want non-default nexthops for the relay_domains, just use the default
setting of relay_transport = relay without an explicit nexthop.
Hello!
Your original suggestion has now been tested, but there is some issue with the
Peter S?rensen:
Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
hash:/etc/postfix/myrelaydomains(0,lock|fold_fix) has changed _ restarting
This is how Postfix works when you change a hash file. If this
bothers you. don't use unnecessary postmap commands.
Wietse
Peter S?rensen:
I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
performance issue
concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround
for
the mysql problems.
Use proxymap.
Replace mysql:/file/name by proxy:mysql:/file/name.
Dear
I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
i have set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
content:
/^To:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients.
/^Cc:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients.
David Touzeau:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Dear
I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
i have set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
content:
/^To:([^@]*@){50,}/ REJECT Sorry, your message has too many recepients.
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 07:21 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
David Touzeau:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Dear
I would like to limit the recipients number in Bcc Header field
i have set
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
content:
Am 25.03.2011 12:19, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Peter S?rensen:
I am fully aware that postfix supports mysql. The reason is actually a
performance issue
concerning the mysql backend so you might see this as a temporary workaround
for
the mysql problems.
Use proxymap.
Replace
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
What do you means when you said BCC is deleted ?
You means that BCC is not stored in the header when postfix try to catch it
BCC is BLIND Carbon Copy. It wouldn't be very blind if the BCC header was
allowed to stay in the message so to prevent that,
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some settings in the
mysql backend.
But still - this annoys me. What is triggering
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 07:06 -0500, Larry Stone a écrit :
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
What do you means when you said BCC is deleted ?
You means that BCC is not stored in the header when postfix try to catch it
BCC is BLIND Carbon Copy. It wouldn't be very blind if the
Jeroen van Aart put forth on 3/23/2011 5:06 PM:
I am curious if postfix would be able to send out 30 emails in one
hour, to different recipients of course.
How are you injecting the 30k emails into Postfix? Mailing list manager
or other means? Via SMTP or the local sendmail command?
--
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
It does not work, the target still receive two copies.
Steve Jenkins put forth on 3/23/2011 7:22 PM:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Joe j...@tmsusa.com wrote:
IMNSHO it's standard practice to run a dns server on the MX host. If you
don't want a full blown bind server, at least run some sort of caching dns
server; the difference in the lookup
David Touzeau:
So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
or
it is not possible ?
The Postfix cleanup daemon does not care how many recipients are
in the BCC header.
If you submit mail with an SMTP client, the recipients are
On 25/03/2011 12:06, Peter Sørensen wrote:
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some settings in the
mysql backend.
But
Peter S?rensen:
But still - this annoys me. What is triggering postfix to make this behavior?
By running the postmap command every five minutes.
Wietse
I've redone the official doc from your website to the point I don't see
issues.
I need a way to provoke more logging or info out of dovecot smtpd so I can see
why my auth is failing. I need to see more than the message from my ISP. Is
there any way to see more about the dovecot communication
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
David Touzeau:
So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
or
it is not possible ?
The Postfix cleanup daemon does not care how many recipients are
in the
David Touzeau:
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 ? 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
David Touzeau:
So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
or
it is not possible ?
The Postfix cleanup daemon does not care how many
Walt Shekrota:
if I telnet localhost smtp I get a lot of seemingly inert debug or trace info
in the same log which ultimately gets...
SASL: Connect to private/auth failed: connection refused
This means one or more of the following:
- The Dovecot authentication server does not listen on the
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 08:57 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
David Touzeau:
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 ? 08:23 -0400, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
David Touzeau:
So is there a tips/HOWTO in order to reject messages that store more
than 50 emails addresses in BCC header
or
it is
Zitat von Peter Sørensen mas...@sdu.dk:
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious
problems with the clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
I will get back to the proxymap solution. I have adjusted some
settings in the mysql backend.
You
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
It does not work, the target still receive two
On Friday 25 March 2011 09:09:27 Wietse Venema wrote:
Walt Shekrota:
if I telnet localhost smtp I get a lot of seemingly inert debug or trace
info in the same log which ultimately gets...
SASL: Connect to private/auth failed: connection refused
This means one or more of the following:
On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
It
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o
Walt Shekrota:
Mar 24 13:57:27 ubu postfix/smtp[15875]: BAD9F82CB0:
to=penguinac...@gmail.com, relay=199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207]:25,
delay=0.57, delays=0.2/0.03/0.17/0.17, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host
199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207] said: 554 5.7.1 Error: The message could
not
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Walt Shekrota
wshekr...@penguinacity.org wrote:
ok :( then I am at fault in understanding. The outgoing process must then be
fully contained within postfix and the sasl2-bin. (still?) The above message
is the ISP saying you didn't authenticate. Is smtpd then
On 03/25/2011 03:01 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 02:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n -
On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
Walt Shekrota:
Mar 24 13:57:27 ubu postfix/smtp[15875]: BAD9F82CB0:
to=penguinac...@gmail.com, relay=199.224.64.207[199.224.64.207]:25,
delay=0.57, delays=0.2/0.03/0.17/0.17, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced
(host
I'm trying to match this and similar phish mail subjects:
Subject: CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL HAS WON $500,000.00USD
postmap -q matches this expression, but this is too broad.
/Subject:.*won.*\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
In the second, and variations, escaping the $ doesn't seem to
Wietse:
The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
SASL authentication in the Postfix SMTP/LMTP client).
Walt Shekrota:
Ok yes that is
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
You means this instead ?
#
# Postfix master process configuration file. For details
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
You means this instead ?
#
# Postfix
On 03/25/2011 03:31 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr:
smtp inetn - n - 300 smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
You means this instead ?
#
#
On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
SASL authentication in the Postfix
On Friday 25 March 2011 10:09:23 Wietse Venema wrote:
The remote SMTP server rejects mail from your Postfix SMTP client.
To configure SASL authentication in your Postfix SMTP client, see
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl (Configuring
SASL authentication in the Postfix
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
/Subject:.*won.*\$\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
/Subject:.*won \$\d.*/REJECT Probable phish
What the heck am I missing WRT making $ literal?
Likely that it must be quoted/escaped correctly in the shell:
$ cat won_money
Rob Foehl put forth on 3/25/2011 10:03 AM:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
/Subject:.*won.*\$\d.*/ REJECT Probable phish
/Subject:.*won \$\d.*/REJECT Probable phish
What the heck am I missing WRT making $ literal?
Likely that it must be quoted/escaped
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:01:58 Wietse Venema wrote:
You must first fix the problem with SENDING MAIL to the REMOTE SERVER.
The REMOTE SERVER is not on localhost port 25.
ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviously I
picked up a bad idea in some doc. So when I
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Walt Shekrota
wshekr...@penguinacity.org wrote:
ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviously I
picked up a bad idea in some doc. So when I telnet auth with the remote its
fine.
235 2.7.0 Authentication successful
I'm grasping
On 3/25/2011 11:12 AM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:01:58 Wietse Venema wrote:
You must first fix the problem with SENDING MAIL to the REMOTE SERVER.
The REMOTE SERVER is not on localhost port 25.
ok point taken... the server in that doc is the remote isp then obviously I
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:28:26 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
1. The authentication really happened when postfix/smtp tried deliver?
I used telnet to verify that I truely have THE RIGHT ID AND PW
Now I look in the /etc/postfix/sasl_password I created and see it the same so
I am at a loss
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
relayhost = 199.224.64.207
smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
As documented, they MUST be equal
yes I read that last night and fixed it. Something I alternatively read
Walt Shekrota:
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
relayhost = 199.224.64.207
smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
As documented, they MUST be equal
yes I read that last night and fixed it.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Walt Shekrota wrote:
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:32:01 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
smtp.frontier.com wshekro...@frontier.com:x
relayhost = 199.224.64.207
smtp.frontier.com != 199.224.64.207
As documented, they MUST be equal
On Friday 25 March 2011 12:34:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
1. Why did you switch from ssmtp? It's possible, even likely, that
your needs would be better served by a null SMTP client, rather
than a MTA such as Postfix.
Like you said this enables you to use a single client to access your mail.
I installed both pdns-recursor and unbound (running without any zone
data) on a test box and got very similar performance results from
both. We happened to go with unbound, but based on your
recommendation, maybe I'll give pdns-recursor another look (it's still
running on our test box).
We
Hello,
Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
Postfix?
I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
with Postfix
# postfix -c /etc/postfix2 -t
Le 25/03/2011 15:55, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
You simply need a caching resolver on an MX/outbound, not a zone server.
A zone server is useless in this case.
Yep - I know that now. :)
I use PowerDNS Recursor on
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
What does come to mind going through these is ...
1. Somehow I have to convey that I'm coming from a non existant domain (mine)
and the remote side
motty.cruz:
Hello,
Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
Postfix?
I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
with Postfix
# postfix -c
Wietse Venema:
motty.cruz:
Hello,
Sometimes I want to sent out email from 2nd instance of Postfix bypassing
scanner, can someone tell me the command to sent email using 2nd instance of
Postfix?
I used a while ago and can't remember full command and I'm not very familiar
with Postfix
Thanks! I appreciated.
-motty
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:34 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: 2nd instance of Postfix
Wietse Venema:
motty.cruz:
Hello,
Sometimes I want
On 3/25/2011 1:26 PM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
What does come to mind going through these is ...
1. Somehow I have to convey that I'm coming from a non
Le 25/03/2011 09:59, Peter Sørensen a écrit :
Hi,
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with postfix 2.7.0
I have suddenly discovered a lot of the following in some of my mailservers
( 5) mail.logs:
Mar 19 02:27:37 mxgw2.sdu.dk postfix/smtpd[5173]: table
Walt Shekrota:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_enable
Trust me I've been through a lot of your documents and some several times.
These are simple instructions to turn on SASL authentication.
Nothing more, nothing less. If the instructions don't work, then
show what you
On 03/25/2011 01:06 PM, Peter Sørensen wrote:
I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the
clustered mysql backend.
I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300.
If you're allowing 1500 concurrent smtpd's to query - say - a dozen maps
each, the default
On Friday 25 March 2011 14:44:07 Noel Jones wrote:
If you're having trouble reading the logs, it's possible
someone here might know what to make of those messages.
If you need help, please see:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
In particular, show us postconf -n output,
Does anyone have a simple policy daemon written in Python they would be willing
to share? I was looking at policy but that's overkill and it might require some
tweaking just to support my tiny requirements.
Gary Smith
Hi postfix-users,
is it possible to share credentials among multiple ldap table files?
E.g. if I have
/etc/postfix/ldap/users
/etc/postfix/ldap/aliases
/etc/postfix/ldap/groups
and in main.cf the
virtual_mailbox_maps = /etc/postfix/ldap/users
virtual_alias_maps = /etc/postfix/ldap/aliases,
On Friday, March 25, 2011 05:35:01 pm Gary Smith wrote:
Does anyone have a simple policy daemon written in Python they would be
willing to share? I was looking at policy but that's overkill and it might
require some tweaking just to support my tiny requirements.
Gary Smith
Sure.
Sure.
https://launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf
Scott K
Scott,
Thanks. Looks much simpler than the other ones that I have looked at. I really
need to have a single check for sasl_username and compare it against a set of
canned rules from stats in a memcached server, and either return DUNNO or
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
wshekr...@penguinacity.org wrote:
Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365: from=ws...@ubu.doink.org,
size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
[..]
/etc/postfix/sasl_password
smtp.frontier.com:25 wshekr...@frontier.com:mypassword
. The sender
Timo Veith:
ldap_table(5) says that a ldap table file has the same format as main.cf.
Can I just put
server_host
search_base =
bind =
bind_dn =
bind_pw =
version =
..
in main.cf and leave the other parameters in the files mentioned above?
Nope, the format for main.cf parameters
On Friday 25 March 2011 18:19:32 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
wshekr...@penguinacity.org wrote:
Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365:
from=ws...@ubu.doink.org, size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
[..]
/etc/postfix/sasl_password
Am 26.03.2011 00:32, schrieb Walt Shekrota:
On Friday 25 March 2011 18:19:32 Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Walt Shekrota
wshekr...@penguinacity.org wrote:
Mar 25 16:55:39 ubu postfix/qmgr[560]: 3485281365:
from=ws...@ubu.doink.org, size=505, nrcpt=1 (queue
76 matches
Mail list logo
