Wietse's advice is the first thing I would try: Eliminate anything that
modifies your message after signing. The most common signature failure in our
analysis apart from DNS setup problems has been a message that was malformed in
the first place, so when it gets fixed someplace downstream, the
On 2011-09-19 07:34, Michael Ribbons wrote:
I have ruled out the amavis setup.
What I need is a way to specify sender_bcc_maps only if the mail is
sent from an authenticated user - This may be achievable by having a
separate cleanup process for submission, but
I don't want to use submission -
On 2011-09-19 03:40, Benny Pedersen wrote:
was reading something about client smtp auth :=)
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/csa.html
hope it will be supported in postfix
Thanks Tony for make the guide
That would be non-trivial to implement in postfix, and since
Hi,
I'm trying to implement the following setup.
Kerberos with LDAP-Backend. Postfix and Dovecot authenticate with Dovecot
SASL against the Kerberos server.
My user informations (logon, name, email, etc.) are stored in the
LDAP-directory.
I can logon to dovecot with gssapi over dovecot sasl
Benny Pedersen:
was reading something about client smtp auth :=)
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/csa.html
hope it will be supported in postfix
This is already supported in Postfix. You just need to find
a suitable policy daemon or Milter plug-in.
If this
Markus Bajones:
Can anybody tell my why postmap can access my ldap data and postfix can not?
Because you run the postmap tests as root, whereas Postfix avoids
using root privileges all the time?
To find out what operation fails, see the section on non-interactive
debuggers in
Hi,
I am new to postfixadmin, but not to postfix, and have just done my
first installation. My problem is that I would like mail for unknown
local users to be relayed to another server, instead of being being
rejected. I have done this before with unix accounts using the
fallback_transport
Tawanda Kavayi:
Hi,
I am new to postfixadmin, but not to postfix, and have just done my
first installation. My problem is that I would like mail for unknown
local users to be relayed to another server, instead of being being
rejected. I have done this before with unix accounts using the
On 19/09/2011 16:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tawanda Kavayi:
Hi,
I am new to postfixadmin, but not to postfix, and have just done my
first installation. My problem is that I would like mail for unknown
local users to be relayed to another server, instead of being being
rejected. I have done this
Am 19.09.2011 16:29, schrieb Tawanda Kavayi:
On 19/09/2011 16:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tawanda Kavayi:
Hi,
I am new to postfixadmin, but not to postfix, and have just done my
first installation. My problem is that I would like mail for unknown
local users to be relayed to another server,
On Mon, September 19, 2011 2:29 pm, Tawanda Kavayi wrote:
The number of users does not make it practical to configure each and
every remote user's email address in virtual_alias_maps, and it would be
a nightmare to manage.
I would be very surprised if there was no way to automate that
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy m...@cloudmark.com
wrote:
I suggest trying again with OpenDKIM (http://www.opendkim.org). The
dkim-milter package has been unmaintained for a couple of years now. It
lives on under the new name, with lots of bug fixes and new features
Am 19.09.2011 16:55, schrieb Tawanda Kavayi:
On 19/09/2011 16:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
so you should make your setup simpler or put your configuration in sql-tables
however, the MX has to reject unknown rcpt directly or you are a backscatter
and will be blocked soon somewhere
The server in
On 19/09/2011 17:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.09.2011 16:55, schrieb Tawanda Kavayi:
On 19/09/2011 16:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
so you should make your setup simpler or put your configuration in sql-tables
however, the MX has to reject unknown rcpt directly or you are a backscatter
and will
I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Postfix, or if it
has ever been discussed?
Thanks.
l...@airstreamcomm.net:
I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Postfix, or if it
has ever been discussed?
It has een discussed, and no-one has stepped up to write code.
Wietse
Hi all,
I am new to Postfix-users mailing list so would like to say hello to everyone ;)
I am wondering what rbl's are you using to prevent your MTAs against spam?
My current config is as follows:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client t1.dnsbl.net.au,
reject_rbl_client
Tawanda Kavayi:
I think I have failed to describe the scenario accurately.
The MX server is not the problem, and it is not where I want this setup.
If the MX server doesn't know a mailbox it will reject mail. There is a
second server. This second server does not receive or send Internet
Am 19.09.2011 19:07, schrieb Marek Salwerowicz:
Hi all,
I am new to Postfix-users mailing list so would like to say hello to everyone
;)
I am wondering what rbl's are you using to prevent your MTAs against spam?
My current config is as follows:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
- Original Message -
From: Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:07 PM
Subject: Blacklists for you MTA
I am wondering what rbl's are you using to prevent your MTAs against spam?
Since one month I have benn
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:19:10 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-09-19 03:40, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/csa.html
That would be non-trivial to implement in postfix, and since this is
the first I've heard of it, I doubt it is very
Hello
I am having problems with the reloading of hash: map files.
The text files are generated on a master server then rsync'd
to the secondary MX server. There seems to be a variable delay
on the secondary MX before it picks up that the .db files have changed.
It appears it can take as long as
* Paul Enlund p...@netpresto.co.uk:
Hello
I am having problems with the reloading of hash: map files.
The text files are generated on a master server then rsync'd
to the secondary MX server. There seems to be a variable delay
on the secondary MX before it picks up that the .db files have
My current config is as follows:
This one:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
Includes these three, so there's no point in using them.
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.njabl.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
This one:
reject_rbl_client t1.dnsbl.net.au,
Le 19/09/2011 19:07, Marek Salwerowicz a écrit :
Hi all,
I am new to Postfix-users mailing list so would like to say hello to everyone
;)
I am wondering what rbl's are you using to prevent your MTAs against spam?
My current config is as follows:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
Le 19/09/2011 19:54, Paul Enlund a écrit :
Hello
I am having problems with the reloading of hash: map files.
The text files are generated on a master server then rsync'd
to the secondary MX server. There seems to be a variable delay
on the secondary MX before it picks up that the .db files
Le 19/09/2011 03:40, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
was reading something about client smtp auth :=)
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/csa.html
hope it will be supported in postfix
Thanks Tony for make the guide
if you like 3/4 letters combination (csa), you migh
On 09/19/2011 02:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
My current config is as follows:
This one:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
Includes these three, so there's no point in using them.
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.njabl.org,
zen.spamhaus.org does not seem to include dnsbl.njabl.org according to
Le 17/09/2011 17:18, tmac a écrit :
I Have RHEL6 and am trying to use postfix for the first time.
My host is server1.lab.my.org
The mail server is mailserver.my.org
I also have an alias file being passed around via NIS. This is used
with sendmail to re-write usernames from
Le 19/09/2011 07:34, Michael Ribbons a écrit :
I have ruled out the amavis setup.
What I need is a way to specify sender_bcc_maps only if the mail is sent from
an authenticated user - This may be achievable by having a separate cleanup
process for submission, but
I don't want to use
Le 16/09/2011 16:45, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 00:12, mouss a écrit :
Le 15/09/2011 03:34, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
hello list
hello guru of postfix
I think I have correctly configure bind for IPv6. but I still can not
connect with telnet on my
Hello Wietse,
thank you for your reply.
I tried to do this, but failed to get any result. Obviously debian
optimized the debugging symbols out of postfix. :-(
What i did now was the following.
In the log /var/log/auth.log i found:
Sep 19 18:53:51 hermes postfix/postmap[5385]: GSSAPI Error:
Markus Bajones:
Hello Wietse,
thank you for your reply.
I tried to do this, but failed to get any result. Obviously debian
optimized the debugging symbols out of postfix. :-(
You should follow the DEBUG_README example that uses STRACE not GDB.
What i did now was the following.
In the
On 2011-09-19 19:54, Paul Enlund wrote:
Hello
I am having problems with the reloading of hash: map files.
The text files are generated on a master server then rsync'd
to the secondary MX server. There seems to be a variable delay
on the secondary MX before it picks up that the .db files have
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email service.
I currently use header and body checks in postfix as part of my
anti-spam measures.
How useful and/or how effective are these measures?
Are they still worthwhile if I am
Hi,
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email service.
I recently migrated from Centos 5.5 to Ubuntu 11.04. I order to get up
and running ASAP I moved my old config from from one system making only
those changes need to
I think this is off topic.
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email service.
Does anybody know of a program... that can white list inbound email
based upon the addresses of emails that have been sent?
I wondered if
On 19/09/2011 23:38, john wrote:
I think this is off topic.
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email service.
Does anybody know of a program... that can white list inbound email
based upon the addresses of emails that have
On 9/19/2011 5:22 PM, john wrote:
Hi,
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email
service.
I recently migrated from Centos 5.5 to Ubuntu 11.04. I order to get
up and running ASAP I moved my old config from from one system
On 9/19/2011 5:06 PM, john wrote:
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email
service.
I currently use header and body checks in postfix as part of my
anti-spam measures.
How useful and/or how effective are these
On Monday 19 September 2011 17:06:22 john wrote:
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email
service.
I currently use header and body checks in postfix as part of my
anti-spam measures.
How useful and/or how effective are
List,
When using a LDAP lookup table the 'special_result_attribute' parameter is
available to allow me to recurse to other DNs [e.g. recursing to members of a
LDAP group]. I can also use the 'leaf_result_attribute' parameter to select
the attribute I want to return from those recursive DN
42 matches
Mail list logo
