siefke_lis...@web.de:
> Hello,
>
> i have the problem that all mails hang by postscreen. I think I be not
> sure. I can not find a mistake in configuration. But local and from
> outside hang all mails in postscreen and goes not through.
>
> [root@de-fra ~]# cat /var/log/mail.log | grep
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 03:44:19PM +0200, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
> i have the problem that all mails hang by postscreen. I think I be
> not sure. I can not find a mistake in configuration. But local and
> from outside hang all mails in postscreen and goes not through.
>
> [root@de-fra ~]#
Hi,
is there a RFC or similar which suggests/requires that the helo name
should be DNS resolvable?
Cheers,
Stefan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello,
i have the problem that all mails hang by postscreen. I think I be not
sure. I can not find a mistake in configuration. But local and from
outside hang all mails in postscreen and goes not through.
[root@de-fra ~]# cat /var/log/mail.log | grep "74.125.82.44"
Jul 5 15:21:25
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Sticht wrote:
> is there a RFC or similar which suggests/requires that the helo
> name should be DNS resolvable?
I think you are looking for RFC 5321:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-2.3.5
See also section 4.1.4 as linked from there,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Sticht wrote:
> Is there a RFC or similar which suggests/requires that the helo name should
> be DNS resolvable?
SMTP is defined in RFC 5321 (which obsoletes 2821 and 821).
--
Viktor.
Am 05.07.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Sticht wrote:
>
>> Is there a RFC or similar which suggests/requires that the helo name should
>> be DNS resolvable?
>
> SMTP is defined in RFC 5321 (which obsoletes 2821 and 821).
>
I think the
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 03:11:57PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> The language in RFC 5231 does not explicitly say that the HELO name
> should be resolvable, but strongly implies it.
No, it does. Note that "domain" is given as the argument to
EHLO, and see how "domain" is defined in 2.3.5.
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:41:30PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> o The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST be either a primary
>host name (a domain name that resolves to an address RR) or, if
>the host has no name, an address literal, as described in
>Section 4.1.3 and discussed
On 7/5/17 2:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 05.07.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Sticht wrote:
Is there a RFC or similar which suggests/requires that the helo name should
be DNS resolvable?
SMTP is defined in RFC 5321 (which
10 matches
Mail list logo