On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 02:34:53PM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> That makes sense, and is exactly what I would expect, but it still needs
> to be documented.
>
> But it does raise another question in my mind. Many places in the
> documentation state that the "Local" domain
That's a non-issue. With that, Postfix will only listen on IPv4 as
specified, when the "inet" endpoint only specifies the port.
That makes sense, and is exactly what I would expect, but it still needs
to be documented.
But it does raise another question in my mind. Many places in the
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:57:19PM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > This is rarely what you want. I'd be inclined to require that the
> > "inet_interfaces" parameter be non-empty (though it could still be
> > effectively empty as a list by setting it to be a mixture of spaces
This is rarely what you want. I'd be inclined to require that the
"inet_interfaces" parameter be non-empty (though it could still be
effectively empty as a list by setting it to be a mixture of spaces and
at least one comma).
You need to be careful what "empty" means. If inet_interfaces has
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 02:08:29PM +1200, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 5/05/23 11:33, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > An empty inet_interfaces means that there is no constraint for the
> > SMTP client source IP address. I am adding some text for that.
>
> I think the question
On 5/05/23 11:33, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
An empty inet_interfaces means that there is no constraint for the
SMTP client source IP address. I am adding some text for that.
I think the question is, what effect does it have on the server
listening address. This is from
While Wietse has his word processor open, I'd like to share a few of my
greatest misdirects in my evolving understanding of Postfix.
To quote a like minded individual
I simply want to help others avoid my points of confusion, in the belief I
am not a uniquirely incapable or unintelligent
Andrew Athan via Postfix-users:
> Thanks Viktor:
>
> > welcome to the internet
>
> Yeah :) I've been here for 30 years.
>
> > unlikely to be productive
>
> I simply want to help others avoid my points of confusion, in the belief I
> am not a uniquirely incapable or unintelligent reader.
>
> I
Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users:
> It was more a rhetorical question in the context of documentation
> improvement. Specifically, the documentation doesn't actually say what
> [blank] means. I think something like the following would be an
> improvement..
>
> Specify "all" to receive mail on
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 07:01:03AM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Specify "all" to receive mail on all network interfaces (default),
> "loopback-only" to receive mail on loopback network interfaces only
> (Postfix version 2.2 and later) or leave blank to disable the reception
It was more a rhetorical question in the context of documentation
improvement. Specifically, the documentation doesn't actually say what
[blank] means. I think something like the following would be an
improvement..
Specify "all" to receive mail on all network interfaces (default),
On 2023-05-04 at 08:21:31 UTC-0400 (Thu, 04 May 2023 14:21:31 +0200)
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello list,
another more question, does postfix support domain based vhosts?
It depends on what you mean by that...
There is no mechanism in SMTP for a server to
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 15:28:
> > Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
> >> [OT] answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4, 3
> >> ipv6, and i have newver seen mails that was remotely tempfailed used
> >> another ip in
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 15:28:
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
[OT] answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4, 3
ipv6, and i have newver seen mails that was remotely tempfailed used
another ip in cloud9, why this ?
Because each host had its own
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
> [OT] answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4, 3
> ipv6, and i have newver seen mails that was remotely tempfailed used
> another ip in cloud9, why this ?
Because each host had its own mail queue. Only the majordomo
related files were
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 14:41:
* Corey Hickman via Postfix-users :
Hello list,
We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server
has
delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers for
second/third delivery?
You could use
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 14:18:
We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server
has delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers
for second/third delivery?
retroisk answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4,
Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users:
> how is "inet_interfaces = all" different to "inet_interfaces = " (i.e.
> blank)?
One says that Postfix will provide network service on all IP
addresses, the other does not, and all this is subject to
overrides in master.cf.
Neither constrains the SMTP client
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users:
> Hello list,
>
> another more question, does postfix support domain based vhosts?
> such as different vhost has different policies, routes, milters etc.
For near-complete isolation of queues, policies, and so on,
* Corey Hickman via Postfix-users :
> Hello list,
>
> We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server has
> delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers for
> second/third delivery?
You could use smtp_fallback_relay
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich
Hello list,
another more question, does postfix support domain based vhosts?
such as different vhost has different policies, routes, milters etc.
Thanks
Corey
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello list,
We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server has
delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers for
second/third delivery?
Thanks
Corey
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
22 matches
Mail list logo